Sign in
Genetic & Genomic MedicineCurrent Issues in Molecular Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Assessment and clinical utility of a non-Next Generation Sequencing based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing technology

Uzay GörmüşiD, Alka ChaubeyiD, Suresh G. Shenoy, Yong Wee Wong, Lee Yin Chan, Bao Ping Choo, Liza Oraha, Anna Gousseva, Fredrik PerssoniD, Lawrence PrenskyiD, Ephrem L. H. Chin, Madhuri HegdeiD

Abstract

BackgroundRolling circle replication (RCR) is a novel technology that has not been applied to cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing until recently. Given the cost and simplicity advantages of this technology compared to other platforms currently used in cfDNA analysis, an assessment of RCR in clinical laboratories was performed. Here, we present the first validation study from clinical laboratories utilizing RCR technology. Methods831 samples from spontaneously pregnant women carrying a singleton fetus and 25 synthetic samples were analyzed for the fetal risk of Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 13 by three laboratories on three continents. All women who provided the samples were followed to birth, where evaluation for fetal aneuploidies was performed using newborn examinations and any suspected aneuploidies were confirmed with karyotyping. ResultsThe study found rolling circle replication to be a highly viable technology for clinical assessment of fetal aneuploidies with 100% sensitivity for T21 (95% CI:82.35% - 100.00%); 100.00% sensitivity for T18 (71.51% - 100.00%) and 100.00% sensitivity for T13 analyses (66.37% - 100.00%). The specificities were >99% for each trisomies [99.7% (99.01% - 99.97%) for T21; 99.5% (98.62% - 99.85%) for T18; 99.7% (99.03% - 99.97%) for T13], along with a first pass no-call rate of 0.93%. ConclusionsThe study showed that using a rolling circle replication-based cfDNA system for the evaluation of the common aneuploidies would provide greater accuracy and clinical utility compared to conventional biochemical screening and comparable results to other reported cfDNA methodologies.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLefkowitz '15Dong '17Bellair '23Camuñas-Sol '17Paluoja '21Liu '19
65% semantic matchGenomics
Roy B Lefkowitz, John A Tynan, Tong Liu+9 more·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2015