Dichotomy in TCR V-domain dynamics modeled for binding the opposed inclined planes of pMHC-II and pMHC-I α-helices
Abstract
Ligand recognition by the human /{beta} T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) heterodimer protein, unlike the surface immunoglobulin (sIg) B-cell receptor, is not governed by relative binding affinity. Its interaction with the peptide (p) plus major histocompatibility complex (MHC) protein (abbrev. pMHC) likely involves some different molecular mechanism linking pMHC binding to T-cell functions. Recent analytical geometry of TCR:pMHC-II solved crystallographic structures (n = 40) revealed that each variable (V)-domain is bound in similar, yet mathematically unique orientations to its target pMHC groove. The relative position of the central cysteine of each V-domain was examined by multivariable calculus in spherical coordinates, where a simple volume element (dV) was found to describe clonotypic geometry with pMHC-II. Here, the study was expanded to include TCR:pMHC-I structures, and to model a physical mechanism, specifically involving the two directionally opposed inclined planes (IP) manifest by the two major -helices prominent in both MHC-I and MHC-II proteins. Calculations for rotational torque of each V-domain, together with acceleration up and down the slopes of both MHC -helices were used to estimate the time a given V-domain spends sliding down its cognate MHC IP. This V-domain rotation/sliding mechanism appears to be quantitatively unique for each TCR:pMHC V-domain (n = 40). However, there is an apparent and common dichotomy between the mobility of each V-domain with respect to the two classes of MHC proteins. Evolutionary motifs in the MHC helices support that the V-domains negotiate the opposed inclined planes of pMHC ligands in clonotypic fashion. Thus, this model is useful in understanding how mechanical forces are linked to TCR function.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CDR3 binding chemistry controls TCR V-domain rotational probability and germline CDR2 'scanning' of polymorphic MHC
J. Murray·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2021
- Asymmetric framework motion of TCR alpha beta controls load-dependent peptide discrimination
A. C. Chang-Gonzalez, R. J. Mallis, … W. Hwang·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2023
- CD8-mediated organization of the TCR-pMHC interface shapes its force response and dissociation pathways
Jiayu Li, Zhenhai Li·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2026
- Quantifying conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface
Benjamin McMaster, Christopher J. Thorpe, … Hashem Koohy·Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2024
- Catch bond models may explain how force amplifies TCR signaling and antigen discrimination
H.-K. Choi, P. Cong, … C. Zhu·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2022
- Load-based divergence in the dynamic allostery of two TCRs recognizing the same pMHC
Ana Cristina Chang-Gonzalez, Aoi Akitsu, … Wonmuk Hwang·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2025