Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Sex-Dependent Effects of Glutamatergic Disruption on Dopaminergic Neuron Subtype Vulnerable in Parkinson's Disease

Kathleen F Carmichael, Victor M. Martinez SmithiD, Jinhui DingiD, Gavin Riccobono, Lisa ChangiD, Lixin SuniD, Lupeng WangiD, Huaibin CaiiD

Abstract

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1-positive (ALDH1A1+) dopaminergic neurons (DANs) are preferentially vulnerable in Parkinsons disease (PD), yet how their activity is modulated by presynaptic inputs remains poorly defined. Here we investigated the role of glutamatergic input by conditionally deleting Grin1, which encodes a critical NMDA receptor (NMDAR) subunit, in ALDH1A1+ DANs. Grin1 conditional knockout (cKO) mice displayed normal locomotion and motor learning; however, females exhibited enhanced operant reward acquisition and excessive feeding with transient weight gain following food restriction. To determine regional contributions, Grin1 was selectively knocked down in ALDH1A1+ DANs of either the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). VTA-specific knockdown in females was sufficient to reproduce the post-restriction feeding and weight gain phenotype. Bulk whole-brain mRNA sequencing revealed pronounced sex-dependent transcriptional changes, primarily in female Grin1 cKO mice after food restriction. Many differentially expressed genes were associated with mitochondrial function, energy metabolism, and synaptic signaling. Together, these findings reveal a sex-specific role for NMDAR-mediated glutamatergic input to ALDH1A1+ VTA DANs in regulating feeding behavior, providing mechanistic insight into how dysfunction of this vulnerable subpopulation may contribute to PD-associated compulsive eating disorders. Key FindingDisrupted NMDA receptor-mediated glutamatergic input to ALDH1A1+ DANs drives sex-specific feeding abnormalities relevant to PD-associated compulsive eating disorders.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISStepek '26Boi '24Hadjas '25Rees '22D’Addario '25Kearney '23
68% semantic matchNeuroscience