TFAP2 paralogs facilitate chromatin access for MITF at pigmentation genes but inhibit expression of cell-cell adhesion genes independently of MITF
Colin KennyiD, Ramile DilshatiD, Hannah SebergiD, Eric Van OtterlooiD, Gregory Bonde, Annika HelversoniD, Christopher M. Franke, Eirı́kur Steingrı́mssoniD, Robert A. CornelliD
Abstract
In developing melanocytes and in melanoma cells, multiple paralogs of the Activating-enhancer-binding Protein 2 family of transcription factors (TFAP2) contribute to expression of genes encoding pigmentation regulators, but their interaction with Microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF), a master regulator of these cells, is unclear. Supporting the model that Tfap2 facilitates MITFs ability to activate expression of pigmentation genes, single-cell seq analysis of zebrafish embryos revealed that pigmentation genes are only expressed in the subset of mitfa- expressing cells that also express Tfap2 paralogs. To test this model in SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells we deleted the two TFAP2 paralogs with highest expression, TFAP2A and TFAP2C, creating TFAP2 knockout (TFAP2-KO) cells. We then assessed gene expression, chromatin accessibility, binding of TFAP2A and of MITF, and the chromatin marks H3K27Ac and H3K27Me3 which are characteristic of active enhancers and silenced chromatin, respectively. Integrated analyses of these datasets indicate TFAP2 paralogs directly activate enhancers near genes enriched for roles in pigmentation and proliferation, and directly repress enhancers near genes enriched for roles in cell adhesion. Consistently, compared to WT cells, TFAP2-KO cells proliferate less and adhere to one another more. TFAP2 paralogs and MITF co-operatively activate a subset of enhancers, with the latter necessary for MITF binding and chromatin accessibility. By contrast, TFAP2 paralogs and MITF do not appear to co-operatively inhibit enhancers. These studies reveal a mechanism by which TFAP2 profoundly influences the set of genes activated by MITF, and thereby the phenotype of pigment cells and melanoma cells.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 39
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The small MAF transcription factor MAFG co-opts MITF to promote melanoma progression
Olga Vera, Michael Martinez, … Florian A. Karreth·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2026
- Structural basis of CBP/p300 recruitment by the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor
A. D. Brown, K. L. Vergunst, … D. N. Langelaan·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2022
- Functional specialization of MITF, TFEB and TFE3 drives radically distinct adaptive gene expression programs in melanoma.
Diogo Dias, Erica Aparecida de Oliveira, … Colin R. Goding·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2025
- MITF reprograms the extracellular matrix and focal adhesion in melanoma
R. Dilshat, V. Fock, … E. Steingrimsson·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2020
- MITF maintains genome stability in non-melanocytic cell lineages and suppresses Hippo pathway signaling
Drífa Hrund Guðmundsdóttir, Adrián López García de Lomana, … Stefán Sigurðsson·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2025
- Novel mechanisms of MITF regulation and melanoma predisposition identified in a mouse suppressor screen
Hong Nhung Vu, Matti Valdimarsson, … Eirı́kur Steingrı́msson·EMBO ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 21, 2024