henhaobio
Sign in

NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Comparative performance of the BGI and Illumina sequencing technology for single-cell RNA-sequencing

Anne SenabouthiD, Stacey B. AnderseniD, Qianyu Shi, Lei ShiiD, Feng JiangiD, Wenwei ZhangiD, Kristof WingiD, Maciej DaniszewskiiD, Samuel W. LukowskiiD, Sandy S. C. HungiD, Quan Hoang NguyeniD, J. Lynn FinkiD, Anthony G BeckhouseiD, Alice PébayiD, Alex William HewittiD, Joseph E. PowelliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The libraries generated by high-throughput single cell RNA-sequencing platforms such as the Chromium from 10X Genomics require considerable amounts of sequencing, typically due to the large number of cells. The ability to use this data to address biological questions is directly impacted by the quality of the sequence data. Here we have compared the performance of the Illumina NextSeq 500 and NovaSeq 6000 against the BGI MGISEQ-2000 platform using identical Single Cell 3 libraries consisting of over 70,000 cells. Our results demonstrate a highly comparable performance between the NovaSeq 6000 and MGISEQ-2000 in sequencing quality, and cell, UMI, and gene detection. However, compared with the NextSeq 500, the MGISEQ-2000 platform performs consistently better, identifying more cells, genes, and UMIs at equalised read depth. We were able to call an additional 1,065,659 SNPs from sequence data generated by the BGI platform, enabling an additional 14% of cells to be assigned to the correct donor from a multiplexed library. However, both the NextSeq 500 and MGISEQ-2000 detected similar frequencies of gRNAs from a pooled CRISPR single cell screen. Our study provides a benchmark for high capacity sequencing platforms applied to high-throughput single cell RNA-seq libraries.

Citations
55
FWCI
2.76
Field percentile
top 8%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISNatarajan '18Xiong '26Korostin '20Wang '19Kim '21Bayard '26
77% semantic matchGenomics
Kedar Nath Natarajan, Zhichao Miao, Miaomiao Jiang+11 more·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2018· 3 citations