NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Comparative performance of the BGI and Illumina sequencing technology for single-cell RNA-sequencing
Anne SenabouthiD, Stacey B. AnderseniD, Qianyu Shi, Lei ShiiD, Feng JiangiD, Wenwei ZhangiD, Kristof WingiD, Maciej DaniszewskiiD, Samuel W. LukowskiiD, Sandy S. C. HungiD, Quan Hoang NguyeniD, J. Lynn FinkiD, Anthony G BeckhouseiD, Alice PébayiD, Alex William HewittiD, Joseph E. PowelliD
Abstract
The libraries generated by high-throughput single cell RNA-sequencing platforms such as the Chromium from 10X Genomics require considerable amounts of sequencing, typically due to the large number of cells. The ability to use this data to address biological questions is directly impacted by the quality of the sequence data. Here we have compared the performance of the Illumina NextSeq 500 and NovaSeq 6000 against the BGI MGISEQ-2000 platform using identical Single Cell 3 libraries consisting of over 70,000 cells. Our results demonstrate a highly comparable performance between the NovaSeq 6000 and MGISEQ-2000 in sequencing quality, and cell, UMI, and gene detection. However, compared with the NextSeq 500, the MGISEQ-2000 platform performs consistently better, identifying more cells, genes, and UMIs at equalised read depth. We were able to call an additional 1,065,659 SNPs from sequence data generated by the BGI platform, enabling an additional 14% of cells to be assigned to the correct donor from a multiplexed library. However, both the NextSeq 500 and MGISEQ-2000 detected similar frequencies of gRNAs from a pooled CRISPR single cell screen. Our study provides a benchmark for high capacity sequencing platforms applied to high-throughput single cell RNA-seq libraries.
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 55
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparative analysis of sequencing technologies platforms for single-cell transcriptomics
Kedar Nath Natarajan, Zhichao Miao, … Sarah Amalia Teichmann·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2018
- Benchmarking Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms: A Comprehensive Comparison Of Single-Cell RNA-Seq from Ultima UG 100 vs. Illumina NovaSeq X Plus
Ruoyun Xiong, Jaymala Patel, … Alex Javidi·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2026
- Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing
Dmitriy O. Korostin, Nikolay A. Kulemin, … A. Yu. Gorbachev·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2020
- Comparative analysis of commercially available single-cell RNA sequencing platforms for their performance in complex human tissues
Yue Julia Wang, Jonathan Schug, … Klaus H. Kaestner·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2019
- Comparative analysis of seven short-reads sequencing platforms using the Korean Reference Genome: MGI and Illumina sequencing benchmark for whole-genome sequencing
Hak‐Min Kim, Sungwon Jeon, … Jong Bhak·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2021
- Multi-modal benchmarking of the Ultima UG100 and Illumina NovaSeq sequencing platforms using clinically relevant FFPE tissues
Quentin Bayard, Zelda Mariet, … Almudena Espín-Pérez·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2026