Protein ScienceBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Assessing scoring metrics for AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 protein complex predictions
Luca R. GenziD, Sanjana Anilkumar NairiD, Natan Nagar, Maya TopfiD
Abstract
1.Recent breakthroughs in AI-driven protein structure prediction have revolutionized structural biology, unlocking new possibilities to model complex biomolecular interactions. We evaluated widely-used scoring metrics for assessing models predicted by ColabFold with templates, ColabFold without templates, and AlphaFold3. We benchmarked the optimal cutoffs for these assessment scores using a set of 223 heterodimeric, high-resolution protein structures and their predictions. Our results show that ColabFold with templates and AlphaFold3 perform similarly and both outperform ColabFold without templates. However, the assessment scores perform best on ColabFold without templates. Furthermore, interface-specific scores are more reliable for evaluating protein complex predictions compared to the corresponding global scores. Notably, ipTM and model confidence achieve the best discrimination between correct and incorrect predictions. Based on our results, we developed a weighted combined score, C2Qscore, to improve model quality assessment. We used C2Qscore to analyse dimers from large assemblies solved by cryoEM, revealing potential limitations of the existing metrics when multiple configurations of heterodimers are possible. This study provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of current scores and offers guidance for improving protein complex model assessment under realistic use case conditions. C2Qscore has been integrated as a tool into our ChimeraX plug-in PICKLUSTER v.2.0 and is also available as a command-line tool on https://gitlab.com/topf-lab/c2qscore. Impact of this workMany essential cellular functions rely on protein complexes, which are now predominantly predicted using AlphaFold by both experts and non-experts. This study systematically evaluates the performance of multiple widely used scoring metrics for distinguishing accurate from poor predictions. The new C2Qscore developed in this study improves the reliability of AlphaFold model assessments, enabling a more consistent and accessible evaluation of protein structures. These advancements support downstream applications in biomedicine, drug discovery, and computational protein design.
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 17
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comprehensive Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer, AlphaFold3 and ColabFold, and Scoring Functions in Predicting Protein-Peptide Complex Structures
Negin Manshour, Jarett Zida Ren, … Dong He Xu·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2024
- Benchmarking of AlphaFold2 accuracy self-estimates as empirical quality measures and model ranking indicators and their comparison with independent model quality assessment programs.
Nicholas S. Edmunds, Ahmet G Genc, Liam James McGuffin·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2023
- AF3Score: A Score-Only Adaptation of AlphaFold3 for Biomolecular Structure Evaluation
Yu Liu, Qilin Yu, … Mingchen Chen·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2025
- Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
Wensi Zhu, Aditi Shenoy, … Arne Elofsson·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- Systematic Evaluation of AlphaFold2 and OpenFold3 on Protein-Peptide Complexes
Rümeysa Fayetörbay, Ahmet Can Timuçin, Emel Timuçin·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2026
- Res ipSAE adhuc loquuntur: What the directionality of predicted aligned error in cofolding models can tell us about scoring diverse molecular complexes
Roland Dunbrack·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2026