Bayesian modeling of skewed X inactivation ingenetically diverse mice identifies a novel Xce allele associated with copy number changes
Kathie SuniD, Daniel OreperiD, Sarah Adams SchoenrockiD, Rachel McMullaniD, Paola Giusti‐RodrígueziD, Vasyl ZhabotynskyiD, Darla R. MilleriD, Lisa M. TarantinoiD, Fernando Pardo‐Manuel de VillenaiD, William S. J. ValdariD
Abstract
Female mammals are functional mosaics of their parental X-linked gene expression due to X chromosome inactivation (XCI). This process inactivates one copy of the X chromosome in each cell during embryogenesis and that state is maintained clonally through mitosis. In mice, the choice of which parental X chromosome remains active is determined by the X chromosome controlling element (Xce), which has been mapped to a 176 kb candidate interval. A series of functional Xce alleles has been characterized or inferred for classical inbred strains based on biased, or skewed, inactivation of the parental X chromosomes in crosses between strains. To further explore the function-structure basis and location of the Xce, we measured allele-specific expression of X-linked genes in a large population of F1 females generated from Collaborative Cross strains. Using published sequence data and applying a Bayesian "Polya urn" model of XCI skew, we report two major findings. First, inter-individual variability in XCI suggests mouse epiblasts contain on average 20-30 cells contributing to brain. Second, NOD/ShiLtJ has a novel and unique functional allele, Xcef, that is the weakest in the Xce allelic series. Despite phylogenetic analysis confirming that NOD/ShiLtJ carries a haplotype almost identical to the well-characterized C57BL/6J (Xceb), we observed unexpected patterns of XCI skewing in females carrying the NOD/ShiLtJ haplotype within the Xce. Copy number variation is common at the Xce locus and we conclude that the observed allelic series is a product of independent and recurring duplications shared between weak Xce alleles.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Field percentile
- top 35%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Population variability in X-chromosome inactivation across 9 mammalian species
Jonathan M. Werner, John Hover, Jesse A Gillis·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2023
- Brain X chromosome inactivation is not random and can protect from paternally inherited neurodevelopmental disease.
Eric R Szelenyi, Danielle Fisenne, … Pavel Osten·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2021
- Single-cell X-chromosome inactivation analysis links biased chimerism to differential gene expression and epigenetic erosion
Robert H. Henning, Thomas Rust, … Victor Guryev·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2024
- Unraveling the role of Xist in X chromosome inactivation: insights from rabbit model and deletion analysis of exons and repeat A
Mingming Liang, Lichao Zhang, … Zhanjun Li·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2023
- X-chromosome inactivation and its implications for human disease
Joost H. Gribnau, Tahsin Stefan Barakat·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2017
- Inflammation-driven cellular selection impacts X-linked mosaicism in the epidermis
Eleni Angelopoulou, Karan Gandhi, … Stephanie J. Ellis·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2026