Interpretable machine learning coupled to gene regulatory networks uncovers subcircuits underlying cell fate decisions
Zarifeh Heidari RaraniiD, Swapnil KeshariiD, Akanksha SachaniD, Ankur Singh SainiiD, Nicholas A. PeaseiD, Jingyu Fan, Alayna Fu, Yuchen C Liu, Aditi U. GurkariD, Greg M. DelgoffeiD, Harinder SinghiD, Jishnu DasiD
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) model causal linkages that control cell fate decisions and differentiation transitions. Prioritizing regulatory subnetworks underlying cell state differences is of critical importance, but current methods including those reliant on topological metrics introduce circularity as the metrics prioritizing TFs are computed from the same networks whose assumptions they inherit. Separately, interpretable machine learning methods can identify latent factors (LFs) that discriminate cellular states with formal statistical guarantees but do not model regulatory linkages. Here, we present FOCAL (Factor-Outcome Coupling for Assessment of Linkages), a paradigm to prioritize regulatory subnetworks by coupling state-specific and dynamic GRNs with outcome-supervised LFs learned using interpretable machine learning without reference to network topology. This shifts GRN focus from macroscopic TF nodes to state-specific and dynamic TF-gene linkages. In B and T cells, FOCAL identified GIFs (GRNs coupled to Interpretable latent Factors), prioritized regulatory subnetworks underlying established states as well as transient regulatory episodes preceding them. By coupling LFs learnt from perturbation experiments of lineage-defining TFs, FOCAL identified transcriptional predisposition to alternative fates within progenitor cell populations before overt differentiation. This uncovered a novel NFATC2-IRF8 interplay in activated B cells, that was validated by in-vitro and in-vivo genetic perturbations. The two transcription factors act cooperatively to restrain extrafollicular plasmablast differentiation and promote germinal center B cell fate.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Logic-incorporated Gene Regulatory Network Deciphers Principles in Cell Fate Decisions
Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang, … Zhiyuan Li·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2023
- Combinatorial transcription factor interactions drive modular gene regulatory networks
Jialei Duan, B Li, … Gary C. Hon·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026
- Multi-scale gene regulatory networks for resolving transcription factor and autoimmune variant impacts on human B cell fate dynamics
Nicholas A. Pease, Jing‐Yu Fan, … Harinder Singh·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2025
- Machine learning methods to reverse engineer dynamic gene regulatory networks governing cell state transitions
Panagiοtis Tsakanikas, Dimitris V. Manatakis, E. S. Manolakos·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2018
- Gene Regulatory Networks that support Multi-Fate Cellular Decisions
Harshavardhan BV, Sarah Adigwe, … Tomáš Gedeon·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2026
- Structure primed embedding on the transcription factor manifold enables transparent model architectures for gene regulatory network and latent activity inference
Andreas Tjärnberg, Maggie Beheler-Amass, … Richard Bonneau·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2024