henhao
Sign in
Systems BiologyRoyal Society Open Science
Peer-reviewed journal article

Sensory Feedback and Central Neuronal Interactions in Mouse Locomotion

Yaroslav I. MolkoviD, Guoning YuiD, Jessica AusborniD, Julien BouvieriD, Simon M. DanneriD, Ilya A. RybakiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Locomotion is a complex process involving specific interactions between the central neural controller and the mechanical components of the system. The basic rhythmic activity generated by locomotor circuits in the spinal cord defines rhythmic limb movements and their central coordination. The operation of these circuits is modulated by sensory feedback from the limbs providing information about the state of the limbs and the body. However, the specific role and contribution of central interactions and sensory feedback in the control of locomotor gait and posture remain poorly understood. We use biomechanical data on quadrupedal locomotion in mice and recent findings on the organization of neural interactions within the spinal locomotor circuitry to create and analyze a tractable mathematical model of mouse locomotion. The model includes a simplified mechanical model of the mouse body with four limbs and a central controller composed of four rhythm generators, each operating as a state machine controlling the state of one limb. Feedback signals characterize the load and extension of each limb as well as postural stability (balance). We systematically investigate and compare several model versions and compare their behavior to existing experimental data on mouse locomotion. Our results highlight the specific roles of sensory feedback and some central propriospinal interactions between circuits controlling fore and hind limbs for speed-dependent gait expression. Our models suggest that postural imbalance feedback may be critically involved in the control of swing-to-stance transitions in each limb and the stabilization of walking direction.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
10
FWCI
1.09
Field percentile
top 27%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMitrevica '26Rybak '24Santuz '19Pazzaglia '25Afschrift '21Gerstmann '22
76% semantic matchNeuroscience
Zane Mitrevica, Andrew Murray·iScience·Feb 16, 2026· 2 citations