bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Distinct DNA-binding syntax and chromatin remodeling capacities of bHLH transcription factors in cell differentiation, reprogramming and cancer
Xabier de MartiniD, Joel Martínez-MirallesiD, Serafima Beletskaya, Adrià Navarro, Jan Izquierdo, Baldomero OlivaiD, Gabriel SantpereiD
Abstract
Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors orchestrate cell differentiation, reprogramming, and oncogenic transformation, yet the molecular determinants that govern their DNA-binding specificity and capacity to remodel chromatin remain incompletely understood. Here, we assemble and unify all available bHLH induction ChIP-seq datasets (74 experiments covering 17 factors) and integrate them with matched chromatin accessibility, nucleosome positioning, CpG methylation, transcriptomic profiling, methyl-HT-SELEX, and structural modeling. Using an exact hexanucleotide-based approach, we define the sequence grammar that shapes bHLH-DNA interactions and identify distinct motif architectures associated with binding to accessible versus inaccessible chromatin. CAT- and CAG-preferring bHLH factors--including proneural and myogenic regulators--display robust pioneer-like behavior, characterized by preferential engagement of closed chromatin through specific E-box variants, cooperative motif clustering, and characteristic spacing patterns. TWIST factors exhibit a unique 5-bp E-box periodicity linked to dedifferentiation programs, whereas CAC-preferring oncogenic bHLHs remain largely restricted to open chromatin. By integrating methylation and SELEX data, we reveal that CpG methylation drives a systematic shift from the canonical CAC-CAC motif toward CAT-CAC E-boxes, providing a mechanistic explanation for MYC enhancer invasion in cancer and uncovering parallel behavior in the HEY family. Nucleosome chemical mapping and structural predictions further show that nearly all bHLH factors bind preferentially at nucleosome flanks, independent of -helix length, challenging prior models of nucleosomal engagement. Together, these results establish a unified framework linking sequence syntax, chromatin state, and transcriptional outcome across the bHLH family, providing mechanistic principles for understanding lineage specification, reprogramming, and oncogenic enhancer remodeling.
- organism: human
- assay: ChIP-seq
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic transcription factor binding site selection is edited by the chromatin remodeling factor CHD4
Mika Saotome, Deepak Balakrishnan Poduval, … Motoki Takaku·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2024
- Chromatin-dependent motif syntax defines differentiation trajectories
Sevi Durdu, Murat Iskar, … Dirk Schübeler·Molecular CellPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025
- Recruitment of Homodimeric Proneural Factors by Conserved CAT-CAT E-Boxes Drives Major Epigenetic Reconfiguration in Cortical Neurogenesis
Xabier de Martin, Baldomero Oliva, Gabriel Santpere·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2024
- Hox binding specificity is directed by DNA sequence preferences and differential abilities to engage inaccessible chromatin.
Milica Bulajić, Divyanshi Srivastava, … Esteban O. Mazzoni·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Homologous BHLH transcription factors induce distinct deformations of torsionally-stressed DNA: a potential transcription regulation mechanism.
J. Hörberg, K. Moreau, A. Reymer·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2022
- Detection of new pioneer transcription factors as cell-type specific nucleosome binders
Yunhui Peng, Wei Song, … Anna R. Panchenko·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2023