Chromosome (mis)segregation is biased by kinetochore size

Abstract

Summary:\n\nAneuploidy, the gain or loss of chromosomes, arises through problems in chromosome segregation during mitosis or meiosis and has been implicated in cancer and developmental abnormalities in humans [1]. Possible routes to aneuploidy include a compromised spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), cohesion defects, centrosome amplification, as well as improper kinetochore-microtubule attachments [2]. However, none of these established routes takes into account the intrinsic features of the kinetochore - the critical chromosomal interface with spindle microtubules. Kinetochore size and respective microtubule binding capacity varies between different animal and plant species [3-10], among different chromosomes from the same species (including humans) [3, 11-15], and in response to microtubule attachments throughout mitosis [16-18]. How kinetochore size impacts chromosome segregation remains unknown. Addressing this fundamental question in human cells is virtually impossible, because most of the 23 pairs of chromosomes cannot be morphologically distinguished, while detection of 2-3 fold differences in kinetochore size is limited by diffraction and cannot be resolved by conventional light microscopy in living cells. Here we used the unique cytological attributes of female Indian muntjac, the mammal with the lowest known chromosome number (n=3), to track individual chromosomes with distinct kinetochore sizes throughout mitosis. We found that chromosomes with larger kinetochores bi-orient more easily and are biased to congress to the equator in a motor-independent manner. However, they are also more prone to establish erroneous merotelic attachments and lag behind during anaphase. Thus, we uncovered an intrinsic kinetochore feature - size - as an important determinant of chromosome segregation fidelity.