Sign in
Molecular BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Asymmetrical cleavages of Sleeping Beauty transposons generate multiple excised transposon fragments during transposition

Qilin GuiD, Xiaojie YangiD, Qing LiiD, Yong LongiD, Guili SongiD, De‐Sheng PeiiD, Perry B. Hackett, Jun CheniD, Jinrong PengiD, Zongbin CuiiD

Abstract

Although the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon is the most validated DNA transposon used as a gene delivery vehicle in vertebrates, many details of the excision and integration steps in the transposition process are unclear. We have probed in detail the products of the excision step and apparent selective integration of a subset of those products during transposition. The standard model of SB transposase-mediated transposition includes symmetrical cleavages at both ends of the transposon for excision and re-integration in another DNA sequence. In our analysis of excised transposon fragments (ETFs), we found evidence for the requirement of certain flanking sequences for efficient cleavage and a significant rate of asymmetrical cleavage during the excision process that generates multiple ETFs. Our results suggest that the cleavage step by SB transposase is not as precise as indicated in most models. Repair of the donor ends can produce eight footprint sequences (TACTGTA, TACAGTA, TACATA, TACGTA, TATGTA, TACTA, TAGTA and TATA). Our data also suggest that mismatch repair (MMR) is not an essential requirement for footprint formation. Among the twenty liberated ETFs, only eight appear to effectively re-integrate into TA sites distributed across the genome, supporting earlier findings of unequal rates of excision and reintegration during SB transposition. These findings may be important in considerations of efficiency of SB transposon remobilization, selection of TA integration sites and detection of SB excision and integration loci, all of which may be important in human gene therapy.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.