A generalizable normalization framework to decouple protocol and instrument effects: Application to high-sensitivity proteomics multicentric study (PME13)

Abstract

Multicenter studies are essential for benchmarking analytical workflows, yet their interpretation is often confounded by the combined effects of experimental protocols and instrumentation. To address this challenge, we introduce a simple normalization-based analytical framework, the recovery metric ({rho}), designed to decouple protocol driven effects from instrument dependent variability. We applied this framework to the 13th Proteomics Multicentric Experiment (PME13), a large multicentric proteomics dataset generated across 27 laboratories using high sensitivity workflows and varying sample preparation protocols. By leveraging a common digested reference sample, {rho} enables direct cross-comparison of all datasets on a unified scale, effectively minimizing instrument-related biases. Using this approach, we demonstrate that apparent instrument dependent trends are largely removed when evaluated through {rho}, revealing consistent protocol driven effects across laboratories. Statistical modeling identified key variables influencing {rho}, including sample input amount, reduction and alkylation, and the use of n-dodecyl-{beta}-D-maltoside (DDM). While DDM was associated with improved {rho}, reduction and alkylation and additional handling steps led to reduced performance, particularly at low input levels. We further highlight practical considerations for the application of ratio based normalization, including the occurrence of values exceeding theoretical bounds, which reflect deviations from underlying assumptions and require appropriate filtering. Overall, this work establishes a generalizable analytical strategy for disentangling confounding factors in multicentric datasets and provides practical guidelines for optimizing high sensitivity proteomics (HSP) workflows. The proposed framework is broadly applicable to other analytical fields where cross laboratory comparability is required.