Modelling double strand break susceptibility to interrogate structural variation in cancer
Tracy J. BallingeriD, Britta A. M. BouwmaniD, Reza MirzazadehiD, Silvano GarneroneiD, Nicola CrosettoiD, Colin A M SempleiD
Abstract
BackgroundStructural variants (SVs) are known to play important roles in a variety of cancers, but their origins and functional consequences are still poorly understood. Many SVs are thought to emerge via errors in the repair processes following DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and previous studies have experimentally measured DSB frequencies across the genome in cell lines.\n\nResultsUsing these data we derive the first quantitative genome-wide models of DSB susceptibility, based upon underlying chromatin and sequence features. These models are accurate and provide novel insights into the mutational mechanisms generating DSBs. Models trained in one cell type can be successfully applied to others, but a substantial proportion of DSBs appear to reflect cell type specific processes. Using model predictions as a proxy for susceptibility to DSBs in tumours, many SV enriched regions appear to be poorly explained by selectively neutral mutational bias alone. A substantial number of these regions show unexpectedly high SV breakpoint frequencies given their predicted susceptibility to mutation, and are therefore credible targets of positive selection in tumours. These putatively positively selected SV hotspots are enriched for genes previously shown to be oncogenic. In contrast, several hundred regions across the genome show unexpectedly low levels of SVs, given their relatively high susceptibility to mutation. These novel coldspot regions appear to be subject to purifying selection in tumours and are enriched for active promoters and enhancers.\n\nConclusionsWe conclude that models of DSB susceptibility offer a rigorous approach to the inference of SVs putatively subject to selection in tumours.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Field percentile
- top 19%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modeling tissue-specific breakpoint proximity of structural variations from 2,382 whole-genomes to identify cancer drivers
A. Martinez-Fundichely, A. Dixon, E. Khurana·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2021
- Cell-cycle dependent DNA repair and replication unifies patterns of chromosome instability
Bingxin Lu, Samuel Winnall, … Chris P. Barnes·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2025
- The impact of mutational processes on structural genomic plasticity in cancer cells
T. Funnell, C. H. O'Flanagan, … S. Aparicio·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2021
- Fine-scale characterization of genomic structural variation in the human genome reveals adaptive and biomedically relevant hotspots
Yen‐Lung Lin, Ömer Gökçümen·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2019
- iMUT-seq: high-resolution mapping of DSB mutational landscapes reveals new insights into the mutagenic mechanisms of DSB repair
Aldo S. Bader, Martin Bushell·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2021
- Replication fork directionality reveals how structural variants arise under replication stress
Dominik Głodzik, Mathilda Rigby, … Peter J. Park·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026