bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
cf-Cabernet: Nick Repair Prior to End Repair Preserves Endogenous DNA Methylation Information in Cell-Free DNA Methylation Sequencing
Tianjiao YuaniD, Yali BaiiD, Liyang SongiD, Aicui Zhang, Yueyang LiuiD, Y J CaoiD
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation profiling holds great promise for non-invasive cancer detection, yet accurate methylome analysis is compromised by DNA damage inherent to cfDNA. Standard library preparation workflows involve an end-repair step during which DNA polymerases can initiate synthesis from single-strand breaks (nicks), replacing endogenous methylated nucleotides with unmethylated nucleotides in the 3' direction and systematically erasing methylation information. This artifact is distinct from the terminal jagged-end effect and disproportionately affects cfDNA and FFPE DNA, which harbor abundant nicks. Here, we developed cf-Cabernet, which builds upon the Cabernet framework (Cao et al., 2023) -- an enzymatic methylation sequencing method featuring carrier DNA-assisted sample recovery and amplification-friendly post-conversion processing -- with the addition of a Taq DNA ligase-mediated nick repair step prior to end repair. Using matched cfDNA samples, we compared cf-Cabernet against standard EM-seq and WGBS. cf-Cabernet and EM-seq both substantially outperformed WGBS in alignment rate. Critically, while standard EM-seq exhibited globally reduced methylation levels compared to WGBS, cf-Cabernet yielded methylation levels concordant with WGBS. M-bias analysis revealed that EM-seq libraries showed persistently depressed methylation across the entire read length, whereas cf-Cabernet methylation recovered to the WGBS baseline beyond the terminal [~]40 bp jagged-end region. Nick-induced methylation erasure during end repair is a significant but previously underappreciated source of error in cfDNA methylation sequencing. cf-Cabernet effectively mitigates this artifact through pre-emptive nick ligation, enabling accurate methylome profiling from damaged DNA templates. This method is broadly applicable to cfDNA, FFPE DNA, and other clinical specimens where DNA integrity is compromised, providing a robust foundation for methylation-based liquid biopsy applications.
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- End-repair causes methylation underestimation in cell-free DNA sequencing libraries
Tobin Groth, Andrew A. Mishin, … Christopher J. Troll·The Journal of Liquid BiopsyPeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2026
- Systematic errors in enzymatic conversion limit cell-free DNA methylation specificity
Netanel Loyfer, Judith Magenheim, … Tommy Kaplan·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2026
- Comparison of double-stranded and single-stranded cfDNA library construction methods for targeted genome and methylation sequencing
Jianchao Zheng, Zhilong Li, … Yuying Wang·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2022
- Sensitive and reproducible cell-free methylome quantification with synthetic spike-in controls
Samantha L. Wilson, Shu Yi Shen, … Michael M. Hoffman·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2022
- Single molecule methylation profiles of cell-free DNA in cancer with nanopore sequencing
Billy T. Lau, Alison Figueroa Almeda, … Hanlee P. Ji·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 3, 2023
- Development of circulating cell-free DNA reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for clinical methylomics diagnostics
Andries De Koker, Lennart Raman, … Nico Callewaert·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2025