Nucleic Acids ResearchBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
Packaged delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins accelerates genome editing
Hannah KarpiD, Madeline ZoltekiD, Kevin M. WaskoiD, Angel Luis Vazquez, Jinna I. BrimiD, Wayne NgoiD, Alanna SchepartziD, Jennifer A. DoudnaiD
Abstract
Effective genome editing requires a sufficient dose of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) to enter the target cell while minimizing immune responses, off-target editing and cytotoxicity. Clinical use of Cas9 RNPs currently entails electroporation into cells ex vivo, but no systematic comparison of this method to packaged RNP delivery has been made. Here we compared two delivery strategies, electroporation and enveloped delivery vehicles (EDVs), to investigate the Cas9 dosage requirements for genome editing. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), we determined that >1300 Cas9 RNPs per nucleus are typically required for productive genome editing. EDV-mediated editing was >30-fold more efficient than electroporation, and editing occurs at least two-fold faster for EDV delivery at comparable total Cas9 RNP doses. We hypothesize that differences in efficacy between these methods result in part from the increased duration of RNP nuclear residence resulting from EDV delivery. Our results directly compare RNP delivery strategies, showing that packaged delivery could dramatically reduce the amount of CRISPR-Cas9 RNPs required for experimental or clinical genome editing. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=85 SRC="FIGDIR/small/619117v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11a1f94org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f3130org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1666938org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@85fd13_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: perturbation response prediction
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 36
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mechanism-guided engineering of a minimal biological particle for genome editing
Wayne Ngo, Julia Peukes, … Jennifer A. Doudna·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 30, 2024
- Engineering self-deliverable ribonucleoproteins for genome editing in the brain
K. Chen, E. C. Stahl, … J. A. Doudna·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2023
- Highly efficient and specific genome editing in human cells with paired CRISPR-Cas9 nickase ribonucleoproteins
Jacob Lamberth, Laura Daley, … Qingzhou Ji·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2019
- Genome editing in the mouse brain with minimally immunogenic Cas9 RNPs
E. C. Stahl, J. K. Sabo, … J. A. Doudna·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2023
- Efficient in vivo neuronal genome editing in the mouse brain using nanocapsules containing CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Jeanette M. Metzger, Yuyuan Wang, … Shaoqin Gong·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2022
- Lung and liver editing by lipid nanoparticle delivery of a stable CRISPR-Cas9 RNP
K. Chen, H. Han, … J. A. Doudna·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2023