American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric GeneticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Multi-polygenic scores in psychiatry: from disorder-specific to transdiagnostic perspectives
Yingjie ShiiD, Emma SprooteniD, Peter C.R. MuldersiD, Janna Nonja VrijseniD, Janita BralteniD, Ditte DemontisiD, Anders Dupont BørglumiD, G. Bragi WaltersiD, Kāri StefánssoniD, Philip van EijndhoveniD, Indira TendolkariD, Barbara FrankeiD, Nina Roth MotaiD
Abstract
The dense co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders questions the categorical classification tradition and motivates efforts to establish dimensional constructs with neurobiological foundations that transcend diagnostic boundaries. In this study, we examined the genetic liability for eight major psychiatric disorder phenotypes under both a disorder-specific and a transdiagnostic framework. In a deeply-phenotyped sample (n=513) consisting of 452 patients from tertiary care with mood disorders, anxiety disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and/or substance use disorders (SUD) and 61 unaffected comparison individuals, we derived subject-specific multi-base polygenic risk score (PRS) profiles and assessed their associations with psychiatric diagnoses, comorbidity status, as well as cross-disorder behavioral dimensions. High PRS for depression was unselectively associated with the diagnosis of SUD, ADHD, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and the comorbidities among them. In the dimensional approach, four distinct functional domains were uncovered, namely the negative valence, social, cognitive, and regulatory systems, closely matching the major functional domains proposed by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Critically, the genetic predisposition for depression was selectively reflected in the functional aspect of negative valence systems but not others. This study highlights a misalignment between current psychiatric nosology and the underlying psychiatric genetic etiology, and underscores the effectiveness of the dimensional approach in both the functional characterization of psychiatric patients and the delineation of the genetic liability for psychiatric disorders.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Application of polygenic scores to a deeply phenotyped sample enriched for substance use disorders reveals extensive pleiotropy with psychiatric and medical traits
Emily E. Hartwell, Zeal Jinwala, … Rachel L. Kember·NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2024
- Multivariate GWAS of psychiatric disorders and their cardinal symptoms reveal two dimensions of cross-cutting genetic liabilities
Travis T. Mallard, Richard Karlsson Linnér, … K. Paige Harden·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Polygenic risk of psychiatric disorders exhibits cross-trait associations in electronic health record data
Rachel L. Kember, Alison K. Merikangas, … Maja Bućan·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2019
- Transdiagnostic Polygenic Risk Models for Psychopathology and Comorbidity: Cross-Ancestry Analysis in the All of Us Research Program
Phil Hyoun Lee, Jae-Yoon Jung, … Andrew David Grotzinger·medRxiv·Mar 26, 2025
- A comparison of ten polygenic score methods for psychiatric disorders applied across multiple cohorts
Guiyan Ni, Jian Zeng, … Vahram H. Haroutunian·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2021
- Using genetics to examine a general liability to childhood psychopathology
Lucy Riglin, Ajay K. Thapar, … Anita Thapar·Behavior GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2019