Sign in
Cell BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Cell size reduction scales spindle elongation but not chromosome segregation in C. elegans

Chukwuebuka William OkaforntaiD, Reza FarhadifariD, Gunar FabigiD, Hai‐Yin WuiD, Maria KöckertiD, Martin VogeliD, Daniel BaumiD, Robert HaaseiD, Michael ShelleyiD, Daniel J. NeedlemaniD, Thomas Müller‐ReichertiD

Abstract

How embryos adapt their internal cellular machinery to reductions in cell size during development remains a fundamental question in cell biology1-11. Here, we use high-resolution lattice light-sheet fluorescence microscopy and automated image analysis to quantify lineage-resolved mitotic spindle and chromosome segregation dynamics from the 2-to 64-cell stages in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. While spindle length scales with cell size across both wild-type and size-perturbed embryos, chromosome segregation dynamics remain largely invariant, suggesting that distinct mechanisms govern these mitotic processes. Combining femtosecond laser ablation12,13 with large-scale electron tomography14, we find that central spindle microtubules mediate chromosome segregation dynamics and remain uncoupled from cell size across all stages of early development. In contrast, spindle elongation is driven by cortically anchored motor proteins and astral microtubules, rendering it sensitive to cell size12,13,15-17. Incorporating these experimental results into an extended stoichiometric model for both the spindle and chromosomes, we find that allowing only cell size and microtubule catastrophe rates to vary reproduces elongation dynamics across development. The same model also accounts for centrosome separation and pronuclear positioning in the one-cell C. elegans embryo18, spindle-length scaling across nematode species spanning ~100 million years of divergence17, and spindle rotation in human cells19. Thus, a unified stoichiometric framework provides a predictive, mechanistic account of spindle and nuclear dynamics across scales and species.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.