bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
FIQT: a simple, powerful method to accurately estimate effect sizes in genome scans
Tim B. BigdeliiD, Donghyung LeeiD, Brien P. RileyiD, Vladimir Vladimirov, Ayman H. FanousiD, Kenneth S. KendleriD, Silviu-Alin Bacanu
Abstract
Genome scans, including both genome-wide association studies and deep sequencing, continue to discover a growing number of significant association signals for various traits. However, often variants meeting genome-wide significance criteria explain far less of the overall trait variance than \"sub-threshold\" association signals. To extract these sub-threshold signals, there is a need for methods which accurately estimate the mean of all (normally-distributed) test-statistics from a genome scan (i.e., Z-scores). This is currently achieved by the difficult procedures of adjusting all Z-score [Formula] statistics for \"winners curse\" (multiple testing). Given that multiple testing adjustments are much simpler for p-values, we propose a method for estimating Z-scores means by i) first adjusting their p-values for multiple testing and then ii) transforming the adjusted p-values to upper tail Z-scores with the sign of the original statistics. Because a False Discovery Rate (FDR) procedure is used for multiple testing adjustment, we denote this method FDR Inverse Quantile Transformation (FIQT). When compared to competitors, e.g. Empirical Bayes (including proposed improvements), FIQT is more i) accurate and ii) computationally efficient by orders of magnitude. Its accuracy advantage is substantial at larger sample sizes and/or moderate numbers of association signals. Practical application of FIQT to Z-scores from the first Psychiatric Genetic Consortium (PGC) schizophrenia predicts a non-trivial fraction of the significant signal regions from the subsequent published PGC schizophrenia studies. Finally, we suggest that FIQT might be i) used to improve subject level risk prediction and ii) further improved by modelling the noncentrality of [Formula] statistics.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimating Effect Sizes and Expected Replication Probabilities from GWAS Summary Statistics
Dominic Holland, Yunpeng Wang, … Anders Dale·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2015
- Quantitative Genetic Scoring, or how to put a number on an arbitrary genetic region
Gido Schoenmacker, Priscilla Vlaming, … Alejandro Arias Vásquez·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2020
- A selective inference approach for FDR control using multi-omics covariates yields insights into disease risk
Ronald Yurko, Max G’Sell, … Bernie Devlin·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2020
- GIFT: New method for the genetic analysis of small gene effects involving small sample sizes.
Cyril Rauch, Panagiota Kyratzi, … Jonathan A. D. Wattis·Physical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2022
- QCAT: testing causality of variants using only summary association statistics
Donghyung Lee, T. Bernard Bigdeli, … Silviu-Alin Bacanu·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2016
- False Discovery Rates: A New Deal.
Matthew Stephens·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2016