bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Quantitative Genetic Scoring, or how to put a number on an arbitrary genetic region
Gido SchoenmackeriD, Priscilla VlamingiD, Jonatan Pallesen, MY Pikulina, AH Ghamarian, Ditte DemontisiD, Anders Dupont BørglumiD, Tessel E. GaleslootiD, Geert PoelmansiD, Barbara FrankeiD, Tom Claassen, Tom HeskesiD, Jan K. BuitelaariD, Alejandro Arias VásqueziD
Abstract
MotivationWith the increasing availability of genome-wide genetic data, methods to combine genetic variables with other sources of data in statistical models are required. This paper introduces quantitative genetic scoring (QGS), a dimensionality reduction method to create quantitative genetic variables representing arbitrary genetic regions. MethodsQGS is defined as the sum of absolute differences in the genetic sequence between a subject and a reference population. QGS properties such as distribution and sensitivity to region size were examined, and QGS was tested in six different existing genomic data sets of various sizes and various phenotypes. ResultsQGS can reduce genetic information by >98% yet explain phenotypic variance at low, medium, and high level of granularity. Associations based on QGS are independent of both size and linkage disequilibrium structure of the underlying region. In combination with stability selection, QGS finds significant results where a traditional genome-wide association approaches struggle. In conclusion, QGS preserves phenotypically significant genetic variance while reducing dimensionality, allowing researchers to include quantitative genetic information in any type of statistical analysis. Availabilityhttps://github.com/machine2learn/QGS Contactgido.schoenmacker@radboudumc.nl Supplemental informationSupplemental data are available online.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimizing phenotype scale improves genetic analyses in large-scale biobanks
Zhenhong Huang, Manuela Costantino, Andy Dahl·bioRxiv·May 7, 2026
- RL-SKAT: An exact and efficient score test for heritability and set tests
Regev Schweiger, Omer Weissbrod, … Eran Halperin·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2017
- gsQTL: Associating genetic risk variants with gene sets by exploiting their shared variability
Gerard A. Bouland, Niccoló Tesi, … Marcel J. T. Reinders·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2024
- FIQT: a simple, powerful method to accurately estimate effect sizes in genome scans
Tim B. Bigdeli, Donghyung Lee, … Silviu-Alin Bacanu·bioRxiv·May 13, 2015
- A quantile integral linear model to quantify genetic effects on phenotypic variability
Jiacheng Miao, Yupei Lin, … Qiongshi Lu·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2022
- Guidelines for Evaluating the Comparability of Down-Sampled GWAS Summary Statistics
Camille Michèle Williams, Holly E. Poore, … Richard Karlsson Linnér·Behavior GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2023