Using the DNA language model, GROVER, to parse effects of sequence, chromatin and regulatory features on genome stability
Pierre M. JoubertiD, Anton VlasoviD, Nikola Janakievski, Melissa SanabriaiD, Anna R. PoetschiD
Abstract
AbstractGenome stability is shaped by DNA sequence and chromatin context, but their relative contributions to double-strand break (DSB) sensitivity remain unclear. We show that the DNA language model, GROVER, can infer DSB location based on sequence. DSB hotspots tend to contain GC-rich sequences that belong to promoters, genes and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs). Additionally, we identified several specific short sequences (tokens) that are associated with modulating DSB sensitivity. Another model using chromatin and genome regulatory features outperforms the sequence-only model, highlighting complementary and cell-type specific information. Integrating sequence and genome biological features yields the best performance, demonstrating their synergy. Analyzing this model revealed that, dependent on the sample, genome stability information encoded in H3K36me3 and DNase-seq can be learned from the sequence, but not H3K27ac or H3K9me3. Embedding chromatin data directly into the GROVER architecture enabled cell-type specific modeling with performance matching the full chromatin feature model. Our results suggest that while chromatin and regulatory context provides important information, such as cell-type specificity, much of the information shaping DSB patterns is already encoded in the DNA sequence itself. Our integrative modeling approach not only reveals DSB patterns but also provides a generalizable strategy for tracing predictions in genomic data. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=195 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/666402v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@af3ea5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@139d159org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@df455borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@428e20_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting double-strand DNA breaks using epigenome marks or DNA at kilobase resolution
Raphaël Mourad, Krzysztof Ginalski, … Olivier Cuvier·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2018
- Modelling double strand break susceptibility to interrogate structural variation in cancer
Tracy J. Ballinger, Britta A. M. Bouwman, … Colin A M Semple·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2019
- Single-cell resolution of resection-dependent chromatin accessibility in response to DNA double-strand breaks reveals specific gene expression programs
Sarah Collins, Anne-Laure Finoux, … Thomas Clouaire·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2026
- Predicting single-molecule chromatin distribution from DNA sequence
Ruoyu Wang, Junru Jin, … Jian Zhou·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- Using Deep Learning to predict replication timing reveals baseline control of genomic DNA sequence
Nikola Janakievski, Pierre M. Joubert, Anna R. Poetsch·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2026
- Analyzing and interpreting DNA double-strand break sequencing data
Abhishek Mitra, Norbert Dojer, … Maga Rowicka·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2020