Dissection of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint by Proximity Proteomics
Y. A. Garcia, E. F. Velasquez, L. A. Gao, K. Cheung, K. M. Clutario, T. Williams-Hamilton, A. A. Gholkar, J. P. Whitelegge, J. Z. Torres
Abstract
The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is critical for sensing defective microtubule-kinetochore attachments and tension across the kinetochore and functions to arrest cells in prometaphase to allow time to repair any errors prior to proceeding into anaphase. The SAC has a central role in ensuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation and its dysregulation has been linked to the development of human diseases like cancer. The establishment and maintenance of the SAC relies on multiple protein complexes that are intricately regulated in a spatial and temporal manner through posttranslational modifications like phosphorylation. Over the past few decades the SAC has been highly investigated and much has been learned about its protein constituents and the pathways and factors that regulate its activity. However, the spatio-temporal proximity associations of the core SAC components have not been explored in a systematic manner. Here, we have taken a BioID2 proximity-labeling proteomic approach to define the proximity protein environment for each of the five core SAC proteins BUB1, BUB3, BUBR1, MAD1L1, and MAD2L1 under conditions where the SAC is active in prometaphase. These five protein association maps were integrated to generate the SAC proximity protein network that contains multiple layers of information related to core SAC protein complexes, protein-protein interactions, and proximity associations. Our analysis validated many of the known SAC complexes and protein-protein interactions. Additionally, it uncovered new protein associations that lend insight into the functioning of the SAC and highlighted future areas that should be investigated to generate a comprehensive understanding of the SAC.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Signaling protein abundance modulates the strength of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
C. Chen, L. Humphrey, … A. Joglekar·bioRxiv·May 10, 2022
- The Arabidopsis BUB1/MAD3 family protein BMF3 requires BUB3.3 to recruit CDC20 to kinetochores in spindle assembly checkpoint signaling
- The closed form of Mad2 is bound to Mad1 and Cdc20 at unattached kinetochores
G. Zhang, J. Nilsson·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2018
- Core MCC of Arabidopsis thaliana: structural dissection provides new insights into Mad2, BubR1 and CDC20
Eduardo Gamosa, Emanuel Victor Nogueira Gotardo, … Marco Antonio Lopes Cruz·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2026
- Spatial separation provides the force-coupling mechanism for the spindle assembly checkpoint
Chyi Wei Chung, Daniel Grant, … Ulrike Grüneberg·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026
- Juxtaposition of Bub1 and Cdc20 on phosphorylated Mad1 during catalytic mitotic checkpoint complex assembly
E. S. Fischer, C. W. Yu, … D. Barford·bioRxiv·May 16, 2022