Effect of Microbubble Size, Composition and Multiple Sonication Points on Sterile Inflammatory Response in Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening
Payton J. MartineziD, Jane J. Song, Jair I. CastilloiD, John A. DeSistoiD, Kang-Ho Song, Adam L. GreeniD, Mark Andrew BordeniD
Abstract
Blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) using focused ultrasound (FUS) and microbubble (MBs) has emerged as a promising technique for delivering therapeutics to the brain. However, the influence of various FUS and MB parameters on BBBO and subsequent sterile inflammatory response (SIR) remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of MB size and composition, as well as the number of FUS sonication points, on BBBO and SIR in an immunocompetent mouse model. Using MRI-guided MB+FUS, we targeted the striatum and assessed extravasation of an MRI contrast agent to assess BBBO and RNAseq to assess SIR. Our results revealed distinct effects of these parameters on BBBO and SIR. Specifically, at a matched microbubble volume dose (MVD), MB size did not affect the extent of BBBO, but smaller (1 {micro}m diameter) MBs exhibited a lower classification of SIR than larger (3 or 5 {micro}m diameter) MBs. Lipid-shelled microbubbles exhibited greater BBBO and a more pronounced SIR compared to albumin-shelled microbubbles, likely owing to the latters poor in vivo stability. As expected, increasing the number of sonication points resulted in greater BBBO and SIR. Furthermore, correlation analysis revealed strong associations between passive cavitation detection measurements of harmonic and inertial MB echoes, BBBO and the expression of SIR gene sets. Our findings highlight the critical role of MB and FUS parameters in modulating BBBO and subsequent SIR in the brain. These insights inform the development of targeted drug delivery strategies and the mitigation of adverse inflammatory reactions in neurological disorders. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=109 SRC="FIGDIR/small/591538v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (42K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5c8905org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@127e812org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f52dbaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8d3aef_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Field percentile
- top 16%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comprehensive Assessment of Blood-Brain Barrier Opening and Sterile Inflammatory Response: Unraveling the Therapeutic Window
P. J. Martinez, J. J. Song, … M. A. Borden·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2023
- Characterization of focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier disruption effect on inflammation as a function of treatment parameters
Cleide Angolano, Emily Hansen, … Nick Todd·Biomedicine & PharmacotherapyPeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2024
- Neurobehavioral effects of focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening
Sophie K. Elvig, Alexandra A. Seas, … Steffen B. E. Wolff·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- Microbubble dynamics in brain microvessels
J. H. Bezer, P. Prentice, … J. J. Choi·PLOS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2025
- Early micro and nanoscopic responses of microglia to blood-brain barrier modulation by transcranial-focused ultrasound
Elisa Gonçalves de Andrade, Jared VanderZwaag, … Marie‐Ève Tremblay·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2025
- Towards Quantitative In Vitro Modelling of Focused Ultrasound-mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening using an Ultrasound-transparent Organ-on-Chip Device
Nabhan M. Fakrudin, Nathan Han, … Jian Gu·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2026