Dynamics of human protein kinases linked to drug selectivity
D. Kern, W. Pitsawong, V. Buosi, R. Otten, R. V. Agafonov, A. Zorba, N. Kern, S. Kutter, G. Kern, R. A. Padua, X. Meniche
Abstract
Protein kinases are major drug targets, but the development of highly-selective inhibitors has been challenging due to the similarity of their active sites. The observation of distinct structural states of the fully-conserved Asp-Phe-Gly (DFG) loop has put the concept of conformational selection for the DFG-state at the center of kinase drug discovery. Recently, it was shown that Gleevec selectivity for the Tyr-kinases Abl was instead rooted in conformational changes after drug binding. Here, we investigate whether protein dynamics after binding is a more general paradigm for drug selectivity by characterizing the binding of several approved drugs to the Ser/Thr-kinase Aurora A. Using a combination of biophysical techniques, we propose a universal drug-binding mechanism, that rationalizes selectivity, affinity and long on-target residence time for kinase inhibitors. These new concepts, where protein dynamics in the drug-bound state plays the crucial role, can be applied to inhibitor design of targets outside the kinome.\n\neLife digestThe Ser/Thr kinase Aurora A is an important target for the development of new anticancer therapies. A longstanding question is how to specifically and effectively inhibit only this kinase in a background of over 550 protein kinases with very similar structures. To this end, understanding the inhibition mechanism of Aurora A by different drugs is essential. Here, we characterize the kinetic mechanism of three distinct kinase drugs, Gleevec (Imatinib), Danusertib (PHA739358) and AT9283 (Pyrazol-4-yl Urea) for Aurora A. We show that inhibitor affinities do not rely exclusively on the recognition of a specific conformation of the Asp-Phe-Gly loop of the kinase. Our quantitative kinetics data put forward an opposing mechanism in which a slow conformational change after drug binding (i.e., induced-fit step) dictates drug affinity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Results of a large scale study of the binding of 50 type IIinhibitors to 348 kinases: The role of protein reorganization
Vardan H. Vardanyan, Allan Haldane, … Ronald M. Levy·Journal of Medicinal ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2026
- Selective miniprotein inhibitors of Aurora-A kinase designed using interaction-motif scaffolding
Jennifer A. Miles, Bob Schiffrin, … Richard W. Bayliss·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2026
- DFG-1 residue controls inhibitor binding mode and affinity providing a basis for rational design of kinase inhibitor selectivity
M. Schroeder, A. N. Bullock, … S. Knapp·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2020
- Allosteric inhibition of Aurora-A kinase by a synthetic VNAR nanobody
Selena G Burgess, Arkadiusz Oleksy, … Richard Bayliss·Open BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2016
- Kinetic Fingerprints as Mechanistic and Clinical Roadmaps Across KIT Activation States
Ana Corrionero, Niall Prendiville, … Patricia Alfonso·ChemMedChemPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2026
- Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Molecular Dynamic Simulations Studies to Discover Aurora Kinase-B Inhibitors
Selvam Athavan Alias Anand, S. Kabilan·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2024