henhaobio
Sign in

Abstract

Hi-C contact maps are valuable for genome assembly (Lieberman-Aiden, van Berkum et al. 2009; Burton et al. 2013; Dudchenko et al. 2017). Recently, we developed Juicebox, a system for the visual exploration of Hi-C data (Durand, Robinson et al. 2016), and 3D-DNA, an automated pipeline for using Hi-C data to assemble genomes (Dudchenko et al. 2017). Here, we introduce \"Assembly Tools,\" a new module for Juicebox, which provides a point-and-click interface for using Hi-C heatmaps to identify and correct errors in a genome assembly. Together, 3D-DNA and the Juicebox Assembly Tools greatly reduce the cost of accurately assembling complex eukaryotic genomes. To illustrate, we generated de novo assemblies with chromosome-length scaffolds for three mammals: the wombat, Vombatus ursinus (3.3Gb), the Virginia opossum, Didelphis virginiana (3.3Gb), and the raccoon, Procyon lotor (2.5Gb). The only inputs for each assembly were Illumina reads from a short insert DNA-Seq library (300 million Illumina reads, maximum length 2x150 bases) and an in situ Hi-C library (100 million Illumina reads, maximum read length 2x150 bases), which cost <$1000.

Abstract summary

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 17 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC 4.0

Point-and-click correction of misassemblies on Hi-C heatmaps, paired with the automated 3D-DNA pipeline, gave chromosome-length wombat, opossum and raccoon scaffolds from just short-insert DNA-Seq and in situ Hi-C reads.

Hi-C contact maps are useful for genome assembly, and the authors' earlier tools covered Hi-C visualization (Juicebox) and automated Hi-C scaffolding (3D-DNA). The new module adds interactive, visual error correction, and the authors argue the combination makes accurate assembly of complex eukaryotic genomes far cheaper.

Key results

  1. SuggestedThe 3D-DNA plus Assembly Tools workflow produced de novo assemblies with chromosome-length scaffolds for three mammals with multi-gigabase genomes.

    Wombat (Vombatus ursinus, 3.3Gb), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana, 3.3Gb) and raccoon (Procyon lotor, 2.5Gb); the abstract gives no contiguity, completeness or accuracy statistics for these assemblies. · Abstract

  2. SuggestedEach assembly was built from standard short-read inputs only, at a stated cost below $1000 per genome.

    Per genome: 300 million reads from a short-insert DNA-Seq library and 100 million reads from an in situ Hi-C library, all Illumina with read lengths of at most 2x150 bases, together stated to cost <$1000; no cost breakdown is given in this text. · Abstract

  3. ClaimedThe authors present 3D-DNA combined with the Assembly Tools module as a way to substantially lower the cost of accurately assembling complex eukaryotic genomes.

    General statement in the abstract, illustrated only by the three mammalian assemblies; no head-to-head cost or quality comparison with other assembly strategies is reported in this text. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Built 'Assembly Tools', a Juicebox module for spotting and fixing assembly errors interactively on Hi-C heatmaps, and used it with the automated 3D-DNA Hi-C scaffolding pipeline to assemble three mammalian genomes de novo from short-insert DNA-Seq and in situ Hi-C reads.

  • De novo genome assembly inputs (3.3Gb genome): short-insert Illumina DNA-Seq library plus in situ Hi-C library · wombat (Vombatus ursinus) · n = 300 million DNA-Seq reads + 100 million Hi-C reads
  • De novo genome assembly inputs (3.3Gb genome): short-insert Illumina DNA-Seq library plus in situ Hi-C library · Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) · n = 300 million DNA-Seq reads + 100 million Hi-C reads
  • De novo genome assembly inputs (2.5Gb genome): short-insert Illumina DNA-Seq library plus in situ Hi-C library · raccoon (Procyon lotor) · n = 300 million DNA-Seq reads + 100 million Hi-C reads
Methods & tools
Juicebox, Juicebox Assembly Tools, 3D-DNA, in situ Hi-C, Illumina sequencing
Reproducibility gaps
Abstract only: no code or data availability statement, accession numbers, software versions or compute requirements appear in this text.
Limitations (2)
  • Only the abstract is available here, and it reports no contiguity, completeness or accuracy metrics, so the chromosome-length claim for the three assemblies cannot be assessed from this text. · noted in this summary
  • The cost advantage is not benchmarked against other assembly strategies in the abstract, and the amount of manual curation effort the point-and-click correction requires is not stated. · noted in this summary

Read this if you need chromosome-scale assemblies of large non-model genomes on a small budget and want an interactive way to inspect and correct Hi-C-based scaffolds.

Citations
313

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISObinu '23Ghurye '19Lin '24Zhou '22Ghurye '17Pipho '26
72% semantic matchGenomics
Lia Obinu, Urmi H. Trivedi, Andrea Porceddu·bioRxiv·May 16, 2023· 2 citations