henhaobio
Sign in

Neurobiology of AgingNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

MRI-derived brain age as a biomarker of ageing in rats: validation using a healthy lifestyle intervention

Irene BrusiniiD, Eilidh MacNicoliD, Eugene KimiD, Örjan SmedbyiD, Chunliang WangiD, Eric WestmaniD, Mattia VeroneseiD, Federico TurkheimeriD, Diana CashiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

MRI data can be used as input to machine learning models to accurately predict brain age in healthy human subjects. A large difference between predicted and chronological brain age (the so-called BrainAGE score) has been associated with disease and neurodegeneration, indicating the potential utility of neuroimaging-based ageing biomarkers. So far, most brain age prediction studies have been carried out on humans. However, it is important for such a biomarker to be validated on laboratory animals too, in order to better account for specific environmental or genetic factors within a more controlled laboratory framework. In this work, we developed a new algorithm for rat brain age prediction based on the combination of Gaussian process regression and a logistic regression classifier. The algorithm was trained on a cohort of 31 normal rats. High prediction accuracy was achieved using leave-one-out cross-validation (mean absolute error = 4.87 weeks, correlation between predicted and chronological age r = 0.92), supporting the validity and potential of the method. Furthermore, the trained model was tested on two independent groups of 24 rats each: a new normal control group and a "healthy lifestyle" group that underwent long-term environmental enrichment and dietary restriction (EEDR) between 3 and 17 months of age. After fitting a linear mixed-effects model, the BrainAGE values were found to increase more slowly with chronological age in the EEDR group than in the controls (slope = 0.52 vs. 0.61; p = 0.015 for the interaction term). When survival analysis was performed with a Cox regression model, the BrainAGE score at 5 months of age had a significant prediction power (p = 0.03). Our results demonstrate that BrainAGE, as computed by the proposed approach, is significantly modulated by EEDR intervention, hence it is a sensitive marker of biological ageing. These findings also support the potential of lifestyle-related prevention approaches to slow down the brain ageing process. Moreover, the results of the survival analysis further demonstrate that BrainAGE is indeed a predictor of ageing outcome.

Citations
17
FWCI
0.89
Field percentile
top 32%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKalc '24Korbmacher '23Lore '26Boyle '20Dörfel '23Bacas '23
76% semantic matchNeuroscience
Polona Kalc, Robert Dahnke, Felix Hoffstaedter+2 more·Human Brain Mapping·Feb 15, 2024· 27 citations