Neurobiology of AgingNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
MRI-derived brain age as a biomarker of ageing in rats: validation using a healthy lifestyle intervention
Irene BrusiniiD, Eilidh MacNicoliD, Eugene KimiD, Örjan SmedbyiD, Chunliang WangiD, Eric WestmaniD, Mattia VeroneseiD, Federico TurkheimeriD, Diana CashiD
Abstract
MRI data can be used as input to machine learning models to accurately predict brain age in healthy human subjects. A large difference between predicted and chronological brain age (the so-called BrainAGE score) has been associated with disease and neurodegeneration, indicating the potential utility of neuroimaging-based ageing biomarkers. So far, most brain age prediction studies have been carried out on humans. However, it is important for such a biomarker to be validated on laboratory animals too, in order to better account for specific environmental or genetic factors within a more controlled laboratory framework. In this work, we developed a new algorithm for rat brain age prediction based on the combination of Gaussian process regression and a logistic regression classifier. The algorithm was trained on a cohort of 31 normal rats. High prediction accuracy was achieved using leave-one-out cross-validation (mean absolute error = 4.87 weeks, correlation between predicted and chronological age r = 0.92), supporting the validity and potential of the method. Furthermore, the trained model was tested on two independent groups of 24 rats each: a new normal control group and a "healthy lifestyle" group that underwent long-term environmental enrichment and dietary restriction (EEDR) between 3 and 17 months of age. After fitting a linear mixed-effects model, the BrainAGE values were found to increase more slowly with chronological age in the EEDR group than in the controls (slope = 0.52 vs. 0.61; p = 0.015 for the interaction term). When survival analysis was performed with a Cox regression model, the BrainAGE score at 5 months of age had a significant prediction power (p = 0.03). Our results demonstrate that BrainAGE, as computed by the proposed approach, is significantly modulated by EEDR intervention, hence it is a sensitive marker of biological ageing. These findings also support the potential of lifestyle-related prevention approaches to slow down the brain ageing process. Moreover, the results of the survival analysis further demonstrate that BrainAGE is indeed a predictor of ageing outcome.
- Citations
- 17
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Field percentile
- top 32%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- BrainAGE: Revisited and reframed machine learning workflow
Polona Kalc, Robert Dahnke, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2024
- Considerations on brain age predictions from repeatedly sampled data across time
Max Korbmacher, Mengyun Wang, … Karsten Specht·Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2023
- BrainYears: A functional EEG-based brain age clock enables intervention-ready measurements of brain aging
Sierra Lore, Corey Julihn, … Eric Verdin·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026
- Brain-predicted age difference score is related to specific cognitive functions: A multi-site replication analysis
Rory Thomas Boyle, Lee Jollans, … Robert Whelan·Brain Imaging and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2020
- Prediction of brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of accuracy and test-retest reliability of publicly available software packages
Ruben P. Dörfel, Joan M. Arenas‐Gomez, … Pontus Plavén‐Sigray·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2023
- Probing Multiple Algorithms to Calculate Brain Age: Examining Reliability, Relations with Demographics, and Predictive Power
Eva Bacas, Isabella Kahhalé, … Jamie Lars Hanson·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2023