bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
Mechanical memory in cells emerges from mechanotransduction with transcriptional feedback and epigenetic plasticity
Abstract
Emerging evidence shows that cells are able to sense and store a memory of their past mechanical environment. Since existing mechanotransduction models are based on adhesion and cytoskeletal dynamics that occurs over seconds and minutes, they do not capture memory observed over days or weeks. We postulate that transcriptional activity and epigenetic plasticity, upstream of adhesion-based signaling, need to be invoked to explain long-term mechanical memory. Here, we present a theory for mechanical memory in cells governed by three key components. First, cells on a stiff matrix are primed by a transcriptional reinforcement of cytoskeletal signaling. Second, longer stiff-priming progressively produces more memory-regulating factors and reduces epigenetic plasticity. Third, when stiff-primed cells move to soft matrix, the reduced epigenetic plasticity blocks new transcription required for cellular adaptation to the new matrix. This stalled transcriptional state gives rise to memory. We validate this model against previous experimental findings of memory storage and decay in epithelial cell migration and stem cell differentiation. We also predict wide-ranging memory responses for different cell types of varying protein kinetics and priming conditions. This theoretical framework for mechanical memory expands the timescales of mechanotransduction captured by conventional models by integrating cytoskeletal signaling with transcriptional activity and epigenetic plasticity. Our model predictions explain mechanical memory and propose new experiments to test spatiotemporal regulation of cellular memory in diverse contexts ranging from cell differentiation to migration and growth.
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- approach: mechanistic / dynamical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dynamic Self-Reinforcement of Gene Expression Determines Acquisition and Retention of Cellular Mechanical Memory
Christopher C. Price, Jairaj Mathur, … Vivek B. Shenoy·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2021
- Mechanical Memory Primes Cells for Confined Migration
Jia Wen Nicole Lee, Yeji Chang, … Andrew W. Holle·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026
- Mechanically primed cells transfer memory to fibrous matrices for persistent invasion
J. Almeida, J. Mathur, … A. Pathak·bioRxiv·May 2, 2022
- Matrix Softening Controls Stretch-Induced Cellular Memory and Fibroblast Activation
Y. Hong, X. Peng, … F. Alisafaei·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2022
- Mechanosensitive genomic enhancers potentiate the cellular response to matrix stiffness
Brian D. Cosgrove, Lexi R. Bounds, … Charles A. Gersbach·SciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2025
- Mechanical control of the splicing factor PTBP1 regulates extracellular matrix stiffness-induced cell proliferation and mechanomemory
Pei-Li Tseng, Weiwei Sun, … Kai S. Erdmann·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2025