Journal of Biological ChemistryBiochemistryPeer-reviewed journal article
Mismatch type impacts interference and priming activities in the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system
Phong Tuan Phan, Meriç ÖztürkiD, Elizabeth M. Dougherty, Jerusha Ravishankar, Chaoyou XueiD, Dipali G. SashitaliD
Abstract
Type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems direct RNA-guided interference against foreign nucleic acids using the CRISPR RNA (crRNA)-guided Cascade complex and Cas3 helicase-nuclease. DNA targeting by Cascade-Cas3 promotes priming, a mechanism that allows for rapid acquisition of new spacers within the CRISPR array. Target mutations in the PAM and PAM-proximal seed region can block interference but may still allow priming. Previous studies have suggested that target mutations to T and A are tolerated, but that C and G substitutions are deleterious to interference and priming, respectively. However, the contributions of the crRNA spacer sequence to mutational tolerance remain unclear. Here, we systematically tested the effects of crRNA seed sequences on mutational tolerance. We engineered four E. coli strains with variable spacer sequences and tested CRISPR interference and priming against a plasmid library for each strain. Consistent with prior studies, we observe that mutations to C or G in the seed can be highly deleterious, especially at positions 1, 2 and 4. However, the corresponding crRNA sequence also strongly impacts the level of defect, with rC-dC and rA/G-dG causing the largest defects in our plasmid library experiments. Using in vitro biochemistry, we observe that mismatch type at the first position of the seed affects Cas8 conformation, and results in reduction in the rates of both Cascade-target binding and Cas3 recruitment. Overall, our results reveal that although nucleotide identity of target mutations is an important determinant of type I-E CRISPR immunity, the crRNA sequence also strongly impacts immune outcomes upon target mutation.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 15th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Priming In A Permissive Type I-C CRISPR-Cas System Reveals Distinct Dynamics Of Spacer Acquisition And Loss
C. Rao, D. Chin, A. W. Ensminger·bioRxiv·May 12, 2017
- Determining the specificity of Cascade binding, interference, and primed adaptation in vivo in the Escherichia coli type I-E CRISPR-Cas system
L. Cooper, A. Stringer, J. Wade·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2018
- Interference Requirements of Type III CRISPR-Cas Systems from Thermus thermophilus
K. Karneyeva, M. Kolesnik, … K. Severinov·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2023
- Detection of Spacer Precursors Formed In Vivo During Primed CRISPR Adaptation
A. A. Shiriaeva, E. Savitskaya, … E. Semenova·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2019
- Cas10 residues lining the target RNA binding channel regulate interference by distinguishing cognate target RNA from mismatched targets
Sarah A. Khweis, Mason Blackburn, … J.A. Dunkle·RNA BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2026
- Seed sequences mediate off-target activity in the CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi) system
Neha Rohatgi, JP Fortin, … Rohit Reja·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2024