bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint
A multimodal perturbation atlas defines the phenotypic resolution of cellular morphology.
Chad LiuiD, Alexander V. HillsleyiD, Madhurya SekhariD, Cassidy JonesiD, Gabriel SturmiD, Taihei FujimoriiD, Diane M. WieneriD, Karen W. ChengiD, Talon ChandleriD, Alexander Lin, Duo PengiD, Max FrankiD, Leah C. DormaniD, Ilakkiyan JeyakumariD, Ivan E. IvanoviD, Lin LuaniD, Greg CourvilleiD, Chris B CharltoniD, Eduardo Hirata-MiyasakiiD, Sydney RipskyiD, Ziwen LiuiD, Ritvik VasaniD, Kyle HarringtoniD, Kyle AwayaniD, Trang H. LeiD, , Manuel D. LeonettiiD
Abstract
Modeling cellular behavior requires measurements that capture how cells evolve across time, environments, and interventions. Microscopy is uniquely suited to this goal: it is non-destructive and can be applied to living cells in their native context. Yet its phenotypic resolving power remains incompletely characterized relative to molecular assays. Here, we present a multimodal perturbation atlas of 1,000 pooled CRISPR knockouts in A549 cells, profiled by fluorescence microscopy (42 live, 13 fixed markers), label-free quantitative phase imaging of the same live cells (at single timepoints), and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). We develop deep learning frameworks to interpret the rich cell-biological signatures in these ~65M single-cell profiles. At matched reagent cost, phase imaging exceeds the phenotypic resolution of both fluorescence imaging and scRNA-seq, and more reliably recovers higher-order pathway organization. These results establish intrinsic morphology as a high-precision readout of cellular state, and lay a foundation for live-cell profiling of phenotypic trajectories.
- organism: human
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- assay: imaging
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Realtime morphological characterization and sorting of unlabeled viable cells using deep learning
M. Salek, N. Li, … M. Masaeli·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2022
- Biologically grounded cell profiling across microscopy modalities
Enze Ye, Xiaoxuan Wu, … He Sun·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2026
- Assessing the performance of the Cell Painting assay across different imaging systems
C. Tromans-Coia, N. Jamali, … B. A. Cimini·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2023
- Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes
Mark-Anthony Bray, Shantanu Singh, … Anne E Carpenter·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2016
- Morphodynamical cell state description via live-cell imaging trajectory embedding
Jeremy Copperman, Sean M. Gross, … Daniel M. Zuckerman·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2021
- Live cell imaging and analysis reveal cell phenotypic transition dynamics inherently missing in snapshot data
Weikang Wang, Diana L. Douglas, … Jianhua Xing·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2020