Sign in
NeuroscienceNature
Peer-reviewed journal article

Human assembloid model of the ascending neural sensory pathway

Ji‐il KimiD, Kent ImaizumiiD, Ovidiu F. JurjuţiD, Kevin W. KelleyiD, Dong WangiD, Mayuri Vijay TheteiD, Zuzana HudáčováiD, Neal D. AminiD, Rebecca J. LevyiD, Grégory ScherreriD, Sergiu P. PașcaiD

Abstract

The ascending somatosensory pathways convey crucial information about pain, touch, itch, and body part movement from peripheral organs to the central nervous system. Despite a significant need for effective therapeutics modulating pain and other somatosensory modalities, clinical translation remains challenging, which is likely related to species-specific features and the lack of in vitro models to directly probe and manipulate this polysynaptic pathway. Here, we established human ascending somatosensory assembloids (hASA)- a four-part assembloid completely generated from human pluripotent stem cells that integrates somatosensory, spinal, diencephalic, and cortical organoids to model the human ascending spinothalamic pathway. Transcriptomic profiling confirmed the presence of key cell types in this circuit. Rabies tracing and calcium imaging showed that sensory neurons connected with dorsal spinal cord projection neurons, which ascending axons further connected to thalamic neurons. Following noxious chemical stimulation, single neuron calcium imaging of intact hASA demonstrated coordinated response, while four-part concomitant extracellular recordings and calcium imaging revealed synchronized activity across the assembloid. Loss of the sodium channel SCN9A, which causes pain insensitivity in humans, disrupted synchrony across the four-part hASA. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate the ability to functionally assemble the essential components of the human sensory pathway. These findings could both accelerate our understanding of human sensory circuits and facilitate therapeutic development.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
136
FWCI
81.57
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.