Synchronisation of apical constriction and cell cycle progression is a conserved behaviour of pseudostratified neuroepithelia informed by their tissue geometry
I. Ampartzidis, C. Efstathiou, F. Paonessa, E. M. Thompson, T. Wilson, C. McCann, N. Greene, A. Copp, F. J. Livesey, N. Elvassore, G. G. Giobbe, P. De Coppi, E. Maniou, G. L. Galea
Abstract
Neuroepithelial cells balance tissue growth requirement with the morphogenetic imperative of closing the neural tube. They apically constrict to generate mechanical forces which elevate the neural folds, but are thought to apically dilate during mitosis. However, we previously reported that mitotic neuroepithelial cells in the mouse posterior neuropore have smaller apical surfaces than non-mitotic cells. Here, we document progressive apical enrichment of non-muscle myosin-II in mitotic, but not non-mitotic, neuroepithelial cells with smaller apical areas. Live-imaging of the chick posterior neuropore confirms apical constriction synchronised with mitosis, reaching maximal constriction by anaphase, before division and re-dilation. Mitotic apical constriction amplitude is significantly greater than interphase constrictions. To investigate conservation in humans, we characterised early stages of iPSC differentiation through dual SMAD-inhibition to robustly produce pseudostratified neuroepithelia with apically enriched actomyosin. These cultured neuroepithelial cells achieve an equivalent apical area to those in mouse embryos. iPSC-derived neuroepithelial cells have large apical areas in G2 which constrict in M phase and retain this constriction in G1/S. Given that this differentiation method produces anterior neural identities, we studied the anterior neuroepithelium of the elevating mouse mid-brain neural tube. Instead of constricting, mid-brain mitotic neuroepithelial cells have larger apical areas than interphase cells. Tissue geometry differs between the apically convex early midbrain and flat posterior neuropore. Culturing human neuroepithelia on equivalently convex surfaces prevents mitotic apical constriction. Thus, neuroepithelial cells undergo high-amplitude apical constriction synchronised with cell cycle progression but the timing of their constriction if influenced by tissue geometry.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neuronal differentiation affects tissue mechanics and progenitor arrangement in the vertebrate neuroepithelium
Pilar Guerrero, Rubén Perez‐Carrasco, … Karen M. Page·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2019
- Quantitative in toto live imaging analysis of apical nuclear migration in the mouse telencephalic neuroepithelium
Tsukasa Shimamura, Takaki Miyata·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2024
- Cell and tissue morphology determine actin-dependent nuclear migration mechanisms in neuroepithelia
I. Yanakieva, A. Erzberger, … C. Norden·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2019
- Tissue mechanics regulate mitotic nuclear dynamics during epithelial development
Natalie J. Kirkland, Alice C. Yuen, … Yanlan Mao·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 14, 2020
- Apical Constriction Reversal upon Mitotic Entry Underlies Different Morphogenetic Outcomes of Cell Division
Clint S. Ko, Prateek R Kalakuntla, Adam C. Martin·Molecular Biology of the CellPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2020
- Cell cycle dynamics controls fluidity of the developing mouse neuroepithelium
Laura Bocanegra-Moreno, Amrita Singh, … Anna Kicheva·Nature PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2023