Sign in

Abstract

As newer single-cell protocols generate increasingly more cells at reduced sequencing depths, the value of a higher read depth may be overlooked. Using data from three different single-cell RNA-seq protocols that lend themselves to having either higher read depth (Smart-seq) or many cells (MARS-seq and 10X), we evaluate their ability to recapitulate biological signals in the context of pseudo-spatial reconstruction. Overall, we find gene expression profiles after spatial-reconstruction analysis are highly reproducible between datasets despite being generated by different protocols and using different computational algorithms. While UMI based protocols such as 10X and MARS-seq allow for capturing more cells, Smart-seqs higher sensitivity and read-depth allows for analysis of lower expressed genes and isoforms. Additionally, we evaluate trade-offs for each protocol by performing subsampling analyses, and find that optimizing the balance between sequencing depth and number of cells within a protocol is important for efficient use of resources. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of selecting a protocol based on the biological questions and features of interest.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '24Svensson '16Svensson '19Liao '22Rich '26Ziegenhain '17
63% semantic matchBioinformatics
Shumin Li, Jiajun Ma, Tianyi Zhao+4 more·Patterns·Jul 9, 2024· 13 citations