Role of Strong Localized vs. Weak Distributed Interactions in Disordered Protein Phase Separation
S. Rekhi, D. Sundaravadivelu Devarajan, M. P. Howard, Y. C. Kim, A. Nikoubashman, J. Mittal
Abstract
Interaction strength and localization are critical parameters controlling the single-chain and condensed-state properties of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Here, we decipher these relationships using coarse-grained heteropolymers comprised of hydrophobic (H) and polar (P) monomers as model IDPs. We systematically vary the fraction of P monomers XP and employ two distinct particle-based models that include either strong localized attractions between only H-H pairs (HP model) or weak distributed attractions between both H-H and H-P pairs (HP+ model). To compare different sequences and models, we first carefully tune the attraction strength for all sequences to match the single-chain radius of gyration. Interestingly, we find that this procedure produces similar conformational ensembles, nonbonded potential energies, and chain-level dynamics for single chains of almost all sequences in both models, with some deviations for the HP model at large XP. However, we observe a surprisingly rich phase behavior for the sequences in both models that deviates from the expectation that similarity at the single-chain level will translate to similar phase-separation propensity. Coexistence between dilute and dense phases is only observed up to a model-dependent XP despite the presence of favorable interchain interactions, which we quantify using the second virial coefficient. Instead, the limited number of attractive sites (H monomers) leads to the self-assembly of finite-sized clusters of different sizes depending on XP. Our findings strongly suggest that models with distributed interactions favor the formation of liquid-like condensates over a much larger range of sequence compositions compared to models with localized interactions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Balancing stability, dynamics and kinetics in phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins
Guoqing Zhang, Xiakun Chu·The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2024
- Model for disordered proteins with strongly sequence-dependent liquid phase behavior
A. Statt, H. Casademunt, … A. Z. Panagiotopoulos·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2019
- Hydrophobic Patch Spacing Produces Nonmonotonic Compaction in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Henry Silvernail, Wangfei Yang, Wenwei Zheng·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Investigating the conformational ensembles of intrinsically-disordered proteins with a simple physics-based model
Y. Zhao, R. Cortes-Huerto, … J. F. Rudzinski·The Journal of Physical Chemistry BPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2020
- Improved Predictions of Phase Behaviour of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins by Tuning the Interaction Range
G. Tesei, K. Lindorff-Larsen·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2022
- Model biomolecular condensates have heterogeneous structure quantitatively dependent on the interaction profile of their constituent macromolecules
J. C. Shillcock, C. Lagisquet, … J. H. Ipsen·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2022