Magnetic activation of electrically active cells
Guillaume DuretiD, Samantha CoffleriD, Benjamin W. AvantsiD, Wonjune KimiD, Angel V. PetercheviD, Jacob T. RobinsoniD
Abstract
Magnetic control of cell activity has applications ranging from non-invasive neurostimulation to remote activation of cell-based therapies. Unlike other methods of regulating cell activity like heat and light, which are based on known receptors or proteins, no magnetically gated channel has been identified to date. As a result, effective approaches for magnetic control of cell activity are based on strong alternating magnetic fields able to induce electric fields or materials that convert magnetic energy into electrical, thermal, or mechanical energy to stimulate cells. In our investigations of magnetic cell responses, we found that a spiking HEK cell line with no other co-factors responds to a magnetic field that reaches a maximum of 500 mT within 200 ms using a permanent magnet. The response is rare, approximately 1 in 50 cells, but is fast and reproducible, generating an action potential within 200 ms of magnetic field stimulation. The magnetic field stimulation is over 10,000 times slower than the magnetic fields used in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the induced electric field is more than an order of magnitude lower than necessary for neuromodulation, suggesting that induced electric currents do not drive the cell response. Instead, our calculation suggests that this response depends on mechanoreception pathways activated by the magnetic torque of TRP-associated lipid rafts. Despite the relatively rare response to magnetic stimulation, when cells form gap junctions, the magnetic stimulation can propagate to nearby cells, causing tissue-level responses. As an example, we co-cultured spiking HEK cells with beta-pancreatic MIN6 cells and found that this co-culture responds to magnetic fields by increasing insulin production. Together, these results point toward a method for the magnetic control of biological activity without the need for a material co-factor such as synthetic nanoparticles. By better understanding this mechanism and enriching for magneto-sensitivity it may be possible to adapt this approach to the rapidly expanding tool kit for wireless cell activity regulation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Revaluation of magnetic properties of Magneto, MagR and αGFP-TRPV1/GFP-ferritin
Guangfu Wang, Peng Zhang, … J. Julius Zhu·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2019
- Magneto-active substrates for local mechanical stimulation of living cells
C. M. Bidan, M. Fratzl, … A. Dupont·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2017
- Micromagnetic Stimulation (μMS) Dose-Response of the Rat Sciatic Nerve
R. Saha, Z. Sanger, … J.-P. Wang·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2022
- Coupling magnetically induced electric fields to neurons: longitudinal and transverse activation
B. Wang, W. M. Grill, A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2018
- Parallelized manipulation of adherent living cells by magnetic nanoparticles-mediated forces
M. Bongaerts, K. Aizel, … M. Coppey·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2020
- Integration and evaluation of magnetic stimulation in physiology setups
Malte T. Ahlers, Christoph T. Block, … Martin Greschner·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2022