Meiosis-specific decoupling of the pericentromere from the kinetochore
Bo PaniD, Melania BrunoiD, Todd S. MacfarlaniD, Takashi AkeraiD
Abstract
The primary constriction site of the M-phase chromosome is an established marker for the kinetochore position, often used to determine the karyotype of each species. Underlying this observation is the concept that the kinetochore is spatially linked with the pericentromere where sister-chromatids are most tightly cohered. Here, we found an unconventional pericentromere specification with sister chromatids mainly cohered at a chromosome end, spatially separated from the kinetochore in Peromyscus mouse oocytes. This distal locus enriched cohesin protectors, such as the Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) and PP2A, at a higher level compared to its centromere/kinetochore region, acting as the primary site for sister-chromatid cohesion. Chromosomes with the distal cohesion site exhibited enhanced cohesin protection at anaphase I compared to those without it, implying that these distal cohesion sites may have evolved to ensure sister-chromatid cohesion during meiosis. In contrast, mitotic cells enriched CPC only near the kinetochore and the distal locus was not cohered between sister chromatids, suggesting a meiosis-specific mechanism to protect cohesin at this distal locus. We found that this distal locus corresponds to an additional centromeric satellite block, located far apart from the centromeric satellite block that builds the kinetochore. Several Peromyscus species carry chromosomes with two such centromeric satellite blocks. Analyses on three Peromyscus species revealed that the internal satellite consistently assembles the kinetochore in both mitosis and meiosis, whereas the distal satellite selectively enriches cohesin protectors in meiosis to promote sister-chromatid cohesion at that site. Thus, our study demonstrates that pericentromere specification is remarkably flexible and can control chromosome segregation in a cell-type and context dependent manner.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Field percentile
- top 16%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Loss of Sister Kinetochore Co-orientation and Peri-centromeric Cohesin Protection after Meiosis I Depends on Cleavage of Centromeric REC8
S. Ogushi, A. Rattani, … K. Nasmyth·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2020
- Kinetochore individualization in meiosis I is required for centromeric cohesin removal in meiosis II
Y. Gryaznova, L. Keating, … K. Wassmann·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2020
- Elimination of separase inhibition reveals absence of cohesin protection in oocyte metaphase II
Safia El Jailani, Damien Cladière, … Katja Wassmann·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2025
- Condensin reorganizes centromeric chromatin during mitotic entry into a bipartite structure stabilized by cohesin
C. Sacristan, K. Samejima, … G. J. P. L. Kops·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2022
- Defining a core configuration for human centromeres during mitosis
A. S. Gupta, C. Seidel, … J. Gerton·bioRxiv·May 10, 2023
- Cohesin and microtubule dependent mechanisms regulate sister centromere fusion during meiosis I
Lin-Ing Wang, Arunika Das, Kim S. McKim·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2019