Neurovascular-modulation
Abstract
Neurovascular-modulation is based on two principles that derive directly from brain vascular ultra-structure, namely an exceptionally dense capillary bed (BBB length density: 972 mm/mm3) and a blood-brain-barrier (BBB) resistivity ({rho} ~ 1x105 {Omega}.m) much higher than brain parenchyma/interstitial space ({rho} ~ 4 {Omega}.m) or blood ({rho} ~ 1 {Omega}.m). Principle 1: Electrical current crosses between the brain parenchyma (interstitial space) and vasculature, producing BBB electric fields (EBBB) that are > 400x of the average parenchyma electric field ([E]BRAIN), which in turn modulates transport across the BBB. Specifically, for a BBB space constant ({lambda}BBB) and wall thickness (dth-BBB): analytical solution for maximum BBB electric field (EABBB) is given as: ([E]BRAIN x {lambda}BBB) / dth-BBB. Direct vascular stimulation suggests novel therapeutic strategies such as boosting metabolic capacity or interstitial fluid clearance. Boosting metabolic capacity impacts all forms of neuromodulation, including those applying intensive stimulation or driving neuroplasticity. Boosting interstitial fluid clearance has broad implications as a treatment for neurodegenerative disease including Alzheimers disease. Principle 2: Electrical current in the brain parenchyma is distorted around brain vasculature, amplifying neuronal polarization. Specifically, vascular ultra-structure produces ~50% modulation of the average parenchyma electric field ([E]BRAIN) over the ~40 m inter-capillary distance. The divergence of EBRAIN (activating function) is thus ~100 kV/m2 per unit average parenchyma electric field ([E]BRAIN). This impacts all forms of neuromodulation, including Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques such a transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Specifically, whereas spatial profile of EBRAIN along neurons is traditionally assumed to depend on macroscopic anatomy, it instead depends on local vascular ultra-structure.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cortical Plasticity is associated with Blood-Brain-Barrier Modulation
Evyatar Swissa, Uri Monsonego, … Alon Friedman·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2023
- Modulating the Blood-Brain Barrier by Light Stimulation of Molecular-Targeted Nanoparticles
Xiaoqing Li, Vamsidhara Vemireddy, … Zhenpeng Qin·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2020
- Graded recruitment of pupil-linked neuromodulation by parametric stimulation of the vagus nerve
Zakir Mridha, Jan Willem de Gee, … Matthew J. McGinley·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2021
- On-demand, reversible blood-brain barrier opening via electrical activation of piezoelectric nanoparticles for targeted brain drug delivery
Salona Roy, Umisha Siwakoti, … Qi Cai·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2026
- Activity-dependent regulation of vascular cholesterol metabolism acts as a negative feedback mechanism for neurovascular coupling
Caterina P. Profaci, KL Foreman, … Richard Daneman·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2024
- Injectable Nanoelectrodes Enable Wireless Deep Brain Stimulation of Native Tissue in Freely Moving Mice
K. L. Kozielski, A. Jahanshahi, … M. Sitti·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2020