bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Sex of donor cell and reprogramming conditions predict the extent and nature of imprinting defects in mouse iPSCs
Maria AreziD, Mélanie A. Eckersley-MasliniD, Tajda KlobučariD, João von Gilsa LopesiD, Felix KruegeriD, Ana Cláudia RaposoiD, Anne-Valérie GendreliD, Bruno Bernardes de JesusiD, Simão Teixeira da RochaiD
- Citations
- 1
Abstract
Reprogramming of somatic cells into induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) is a major leap towards personalized approaches to disease modelling and cell-replacement therapies. However, we still lack the ability to fully control the epigenetic status of iPSCs, which is a major hurdle for their downstream applications. A sensible indicator for epigenetic fidelity is genomic imprinting, a phenomenon dependent on DNA methylation, which is frequently perturbed in iPSCs by yet unidentified reasons. By using a secondary reprogramming system with murine hybrid donor cells, we conducted a thorough imprinting analysis using IMPLICON in multiple female and male iPSCs generated under different culture conditions. Our results show that imprinting defects are remarkably common in mouse iPSCs causing dysregulation of the typical monoallelic expression of imprinted genes. Interestingly, the nature of imprinting defects depends on the sex of the donor cell and their respective response to culture conditions. Under serum-free conditions, male iPSCs show global hypomethylation at imprinted regions, whereas in serum conditions show focal hypermethylation at specific loci. In contrast, female iPSCs always exhibit hypomethylation defects regardless of culture conditions. These imprinting defects are more severe than the global changes in DNA methylation, highlighting the sensitivity of imprinting loci to current iPSC generation protocols. Our results reveal clear predictors underlying different types of imprinting defects in mouse iPSCs. This knowledge is essential to devise novel reprogramming strategies aiming at generating epigenetically faithful iPSCs.
- organism: mouse
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Alterations of genomic imprinting appear during the reprogramming of adult neural stem cells
R. Montalban-Loro, A. Lozano-Urena, … S. M. Ferron·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2024
- TET3 protects the Dlk1-Dio3 Imprinted Locus from DNA hypomethylation during adult NSC Reprogramming
Laura Lázaro-Carot, Esteban Jiménez-Villalba, … Sacri R. Ferrón·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2025
- Epigenomic heterogeneity and spatial organization during human reprogramming
Terence W. Li, Justin Langerman, … Kathrin Plath·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Genetic Variation, Not Cell Type of Origin, Underlies Regulatory Differences in iPSCs
Courtney L Kagan, Nicholas E Banovich, … Yoav Gilad·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 26, 2016
- High-Resolution Dissection of Conducive Reprogramming Trajectory to Ground State Pluripotency
Asaf Zviran, Nofar Mor, … Jacob H. Hanna·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2017
- Incomplete Reprogramming of DNA Replication Timing in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Matthew M. Edwards, Ning Wang, … Amnon Koren·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024