High-Resolution Dissection of Conducive Reprogramming Trajectory to Ground State Pluripotency
Asaf ZviraniD, Nofar MoriD, Yoach RaisiD, Hila GingoldiD, Shani Peles, Elad ChomskyiD, Sergey V. Viukov, Jason Daniel BuenrostroiD, Leehee Weinberger, Yair S. Manor, Vladislav Krupalnik, Mirie ZerbibiD, Hadas Hezroni, Diego Adhemar JaitiniD, David Larastiaso, Shlomit GiladiD, Sima Benjamin, Awni Mousa, Muneef AyyashiD, Daoud Sheban, Jonathan BayerliD, Alejandro Aguilera-CastrejoniD, Rada Massarwa, Itay MazaiD, Suhair HannaiD, , Jacob H. HannaiD
Abstract
The ability to reprogram somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with four transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc (abbreviated as OSKM)1 has provoked interest to define the molecular characteristics of this process2-7. Despite important progress, the dynamics of epigenetic reprogramming at high resolution in correctly reprogrammed iPSCs and throughout the entire process remain largely undefined. This gap in understanding results from the inefficiency of conventional reprogramming methods coupled with the difficulty of prospectively isolating the rare cells that eventually correctly reprogram into iPSCs. Here we characterize cell fate conversion from fibroblast to iPSC using a highly efficient deterministic murine reprogramming system engineered through optimized inhibition of Gatad2a-Mbd3/NuRD repressive sub-complex. This comprehensive characterization provides single-day resolution of dynamic changes in levels of gene expression, chromatin modifications, TF binding, DNA accessibility and DNA methylation. The integrative analysis identified two transcriptional modules that dominate successful reprogramming. One consists of genes whose transcription is regulated by on/off epigenetic switching of modifications in their promoters (abbreviated as ESPGs), and the second consists of genes with promoters in a constitutively active chromatin state, but a dynamic expression pattern (abbreviated as CAPGs). ESPGs are mainly regulated by OSK, rather than Myc, and are enriched for cell fate determinants and pluripotency factors. CAPGs are predominantly regulated by Myc, and are enriched for cell biosynthetic regulatory functions. We used the ESPG module to study the identity and temporal occurrence of activating and repressing epigenetic switching during reprogramming. Removal of repressive chromatin modifications precedes chromatin opening and binding of RNA polymerase II at enhancers and promoters, and the opposite dynamics occur during repression of enhancers and promoters. Genome wide DNA methylation analysis demonstrated that de novo DNA methylation is not required for highly efficient conducive iPSC reprogramming, and identified a group of super-enhancers targeted by OSK, whose early demethylation marks commitment to a successful reprogramming trajectory also in inefficient conventional reprogramming systems. CAPGs are distinctively regulated by multiple synergystic ways: 1) Myc activity, delivered either endogenously or exogenously, dominates CAPG expression changes and is indispensable for induction of pluripotency in somatic cells; 2) A change in tRNA codon usage which is specific to CAPGs, but not ESPGs, and favors their translation. In summary, our unbiased high-resolution mapping of epigenetic changes on somatic cells that are committed to undergo successful reprogramming reveals interleaved epigenetic and biosynthetic reconfigurations that rapidly commission and propel conducive reprogramming toward naive pluripotency.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Defining reprogramming checkpoints from single-cell analysis of induced pluripotency
Khoa A. Tran, Stefan Pietrzak, … Rupa Sridharan·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2019
- Epigenomic heterogeneity and spatial organization during human reprogramming
Terence W. Li, Justin Langerman, … Kathrin Plath·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Temporal resolution of global gene expression and DNA methylation changes in the final phases of reprogramming towards induced pluripotency.
Michela Bartoccetti, Xinlong Luo, … Kian Peng Koh·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2019
- Transcription factor-mediated direct cellular reprogramming yields cell-type specific DNA methylation signature
K. Horisawa, S. Miura, … A. Suzuki·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2023
- Engineering Cell Fate: The Roles of iPSC Transcription Factors, Chemicals, Barriers and Enhancing Factors in Reprogramming and Transdifferentiation
Behnam Ebrahimi·bioRxiv·May 21, 2015
- The epigenetic Oct4 gene regulatory network: stochastic analysis of different cellular reprogramming approaches
Simone Bruno, Domitilla Del Vecchio·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2023