Nature CommunicationsMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
On-microscope staging of live cells reveals changes in the dynamics of transcriptional bursting during differentiation
Danuta M. Jeziorska, Edward TunnacliffeiD, Jill M. BrowniD, Helena AyyubiD, Jacqueline A. Sloane-Stanley, J A Sharpe, B. Christoffer LagerholmiD, Christian BabbsiD, A. J. H. Smith, Veronica J. BuckleiD, Douglas R. HiggsiD
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Field percentile
- top 26%
Abstract
Determining the mechanisms by which genes are switched on and off during development and differentiation is a key aim of current biomedical research. Gene transcription has been widely observed to occur in a discontinuous fashion, with short bursts of activity interspersed with longer periods of inactivity. It is currently not known if or how this dynamic behaviour changes as mammalian cells differentiate. To investigate this, using a newly developed on-microscope analysis, we monitored mouse -globin transcription in live cells throughout sequential stages of erythropoiesis. We find that changes in the overall levels of -globin transcription are most closely associated with changes in the fraction of time a gene spends in the active transcriptional state. We identify differences in the patterns of transcriptional bursting throughout differentiation, with maximal transcriptional activity occurring in the mid-phase of differentiation. Early in differentiation, we observe increased fluctuation in the patterns of transcriptional activity whereas at the peak of gene expression, in early and intermediate erythroblasts, transcription appears to be relatively stable and efficient. Later during differentiation as -globin expression declines, we again observed more variability in transcription within individual cells. We propose that the observed changes in transcriptional behaviour may reflect changes in the stability of enhancer-promoter interactions and the formation of active transcriptional compartments as gene expression is turned on and subsequently declines at sequential stages of differentiation.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dynamics of gene expression and chromatin marking during cell state transition
Beatrice Borsari, Amaya Abad, … Roderic Guigó·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2020
- Live imaging reveals chromatin compaction transitions and dynamic transcriptional bursting during stem cell differentiation in vivo
Dennis P. May, Sangwon Yun, … Valentina Greco·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2023
- A hyperactive transcriptional state marks genome reactivation at the mitosis-G1 transition
Chris C.-S. Hsiung, Caroline Bartman, … Gerd A. Blobel·Genes & DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2016
- Transcriptional clusters follow a conserved condensation-dispersal sequence during stem cell differentiation
Tim Klingberg, Irina Wachter, … Lennart Hilbert·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2023
- Coordinated Changes in Gene Expression Kinetics Underlie both Mouse and Human Erythroid Maturation
Melania Barile, Iván Imaz-Rosshandler, … Berthold Göttgens·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2021
- Minute-scale coupling of chromatin marks and transcriptional bursts
Xiaohui Gao, Chaebeen Ko, … Hiroshi Ochiai·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2026