Multi-scale dissection, compaction and derivatization of mammalian developmental enhancers
Jean‐Benoît LalanneiD, Tony LiiD, Emma A.N. Kajiwara, Chau Huynh, Tiffany V. Do, Beth K. Martin, Samuel G. RegaladoiD, Jay ShendureiD
Abstract
Gene expression during mammalian development is orchestrated by non-coding cis-regulatory DNA elements (CREs) such as distal enhancers1-3. Despite their fundamental importance, and notwithstanding recent progress in predictive modeling4-9, many high-level properties of enhancer grammar remain unresolved. How does the length of an autonomously active CRE constrain its activity? How robust are CREs to mutations or rearrangements of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs)? And how much epistasis exists among these sites? As predictive models solely trained on endogenous CREs are unlikely to resolve these questions10, we subjected several endogenous CREs to intensive sequence-level perturbation. Specifically, we assayed >35,000 variants of 5 parietal endoderm enhancers, with variants organized into four perturbation classes, designed to probe: (i) the functional sufficiency of sub-fragments via dense multi-size tiling, (ii) local epistasis via multi-hit saturation mutagenesis, (iii) activity-size tradeoffs via model-guided compaction, or (iv) functional resilience via sequence derivatization anchored on key TFBSs, including random deposition, reconstitution, and synthetic thripsis. This multi-scale dissection revealed rich phenomena. Sub-tiling uncovered sharp non-additivity between activity and fragment size, highlighting strongly synergistic TFBS clusters. Compaction showed that natural CREs lie far from the activity-size Pareto front, and that model-guided deletions can yield shorter yet stronger elements. Mutational scanning exposed a spectrum of CRE robustness, from tolerant to fragile, together with rare but consequential epistasis between individual TFBSs. Finally, TFBS-anchored derivatization demonstrated that background sequence can influence activity on par with TFBS arrangement. Strikingly, a substantial fraction of CRE derivatives exceeded the activity of their endogenous progenitors. Taken together, these results reveal both soft and stiff directions in regulatory sequence space, advancing a quantitative phenomenology of how enhancer sequences encode function and robustness.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Retracing and rewriting the evolutionary trajectories of mammalian developmental enhancers
Tony Li, Jean‐Benoît Lalanne, … Jay Shendure·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2026
- Mutagenesis Sensitivity Mapping of HumanEnhancers In Vivo
Michael Kosicki, Boyang Zhang, … Len A. Pennacchio·NaturePeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2025
- Quantifying the impact of genetic mutations on enhancer dynamics
Maitreya Das, Deepro Banerjee, … Santhosh Girirajan·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2025
- Enhancer architecture and chromatin accessibility constrain phenotypic space during development
Rafael Galupa, Gilberto Álvarez-Canales, … Justin Crocker·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2022
- A flexible repertoire of transcription factor binding sites and diversity threshold determines enhancer activity in embryonic stem cells
Gurdeep Singh, Shanelle Mullany, … Jennifer A. Mitchell·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021
- Identification and prediction of developmental enhancers in sea urchin embryos
César Arenas‐Mena, Sofija Miljovska, … Charles G. Danko·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2021