Frontiers in NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
autoMEA: Machine learning-based burst detection for multi-electrode array datasets
Vinicius HernandesiD, Anouk M. HeuvelmansiD, Valentina Gualtieri, Dimphna H. MeijeriD, Geeske M. van WoerdeniD, Eliška GreplováiD
Abstract
Neuronal activity in the highly organized networks of the central nervous system is the vital basis for various functional processes, such as perception, motor control, and cognition. Understanding interneuronal connectivity and how activity is regulated in the neuronal circuits is crucial for interpreting how the brain works. Multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) are particularly useful for studying the dynamics of neuronal network activity and their development as they allow for real-time, high-throughput measurements of neural activity. At present, the key challenge in the utilization of MEA data is the sheer complexity of the measured datasets. Available software offers semi-automated analysis for a fixed set of parameters that allow for the definition of spikes and bursts. However, this analysis remains time-consuming, user-biased, and limited by pre-defined parameters. Here, we present autoMEA, software for machine learning-based automated burst detection in MEA datasets. We exemplify autoMEA efficacy on neuronal network activity of primary hippocampal neurons from wild-type mice monitored using 24-well multiwell MEA plates. To validate and benchmark the software, we showcase its application using wild-type neuronal networks and two different neuronal networks modeling neurodevelopmental disorders to assess network phenotype detection. Detection of network characteristics typically reported in literature, such as synchronicity and rhythmicity, could be accurately detected compared to manual analysis using the autoMEA software. Additionally, autoMEA could detect reverberations, a more complex burst dynamic present in hippocampal cultures. Furthermore, autoMEA burst detection was sufficiently sensitive to detect changes in the synchronicity and rhythmicity of networks modeling neurodevelopmental disorders as well as detecting changes in their burst dynamics. Thus, we show that autoMEA reliably analyses neural networks measured with the multi-well MEA setup with the precision and accuracy compared to that of a human expert.
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- meaRtools: an R Package for the Analysis of Neuronal Networks Recorded on Microelectrode Arrays
Sahar Gelfman, Quanli Wang, … Stephen J. Eglen·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2018
- NOVA: a novel R-package enabling multi-parameter analysis and visualization of neural activity in MEA recordings
Caroline C. Escoubas, Ekin Güney, … William A. Weiss·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2025
- A fast and simple algorithm for accurate spike detection in HD-MEA recordings
Juan Zegers-Delgado, Nathan Renegar, … Ricardo C. Araneda·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2026
- MEA-NAP compares microscale functional connectivity, topology, and network dynamics in organoid or monolayer neuronal cultures
Timothy P.H. Sit, Rachael C. Feord, … Susanna B. Mierau·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- Development of py-mea-span for comprehensive analysis of multi-electrode array data and its application to LGI2-deficient neurons
Zhuang Zhuang Han, Janet Elwyn Deane·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2026
- Automated detection of extracellular action potentials from single neurons
Zhuowei Cheng, Elmer Guzman, … Kenneth R. Tovar·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2022