henhaobio
Sign in

Clinical EpigeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

The inactive X chromosome accumulates widespread epigenetic variability with age

Yunfeng LiuiD, Lucy SinkeiD, Thomas H. JonkmaniD, Roderick C. SliekeriD, Erik W. van ZwetiD, Lucia DaxingeriD, Bastiaan T. HeijmansiD

PDFDOIPreprint
Citations
22
FWCI
1.95
Field percentile
top 13%

Abstract

BackgroundLoss of epigenetic control is a hallmark of aging. Among the most prominent roles of epigenetic mechanisms is the inactivation of one of two copies of the X chromosome in females through DNA methylation. Hence, age-related disruption of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) may contribute to the ageing process in women. MethodsWe analyzed 9,777 CpGs on the X chromosome in whole blood samples from 2343 females and 1688 males. We replicated findings in duplicate using one whole blood and one purified monocyte data set (in total, 991/924 females/males). We used double generalized linear models (DGLM) to detect age-related differentially methylated CpGs (aDMCs), whose mean methylation level differs with age, and age-related variable methylated CpGs (aVMCs), whose methylation level becomes more variable with age. ResultsIn females, aDMCs were relatively uncommon (n=33) and preferentially occurred in regions known to escape XCI. In contrast, many CpGs (n=987) were found to display an increased variance with age (aVMCs). Of note, the replication rate of aVMCs was also high in purified monocytes (95%), indicating that their occurrence may be independent of cell composition. aVMCs accumulated in CpG islands and regions subject to XCI. Although few aVMCs were associated with X-linked genes in all females studied, an exploratory analysis suggested that such associations may be more common in old females. In males, aDMCs (n=316) were primarily driven by cell composition, while aVMCs replicated well (94%) but were infrequent (n=37). ConclusionsAge-related DNA methylation differences at the inactive X chromosome are dominated by the accumulation of variability.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '19Tangili '25Rocca '26McCartney '19Yusipov '20Abeysooriya '26
75% semantic matchGenetics
Shuxia Li, Jesper Lund, Jan Baumbach+8 more·bioRxiv·May 14, 2019· 1 citations