Integrating large-scale neuroimaging research datasets: harmonisation of white matter hyperintensity measurements across Whitehall and UK Biobank datasets
Valentina BordiniD, Ilaria BertaniiD, Irene Mattioli, Vaanathi SundaresaniD, Paul McCarthy, Sana SuriiD, Enikő ZsoldosiD, Nicola FilippiniiD, Abda MahmoodiD, Luca MelazziniiD, Maria Marcella LaganàiD, Giovanna ZamboniiD, Archana Singh‐ManouxiD, Mika Kivimaki BiD, Klaus P. EbmeieriD, Giuseppe BaselliiD, Mark JenkinsoniD, Clare E. MackayiD, Eugene Paul DuffiD, Ludovica GriffantiiD
Abstract
Large scale neuroimaging datasets present the possibility of providing normative distributions for a wide variety of neuroimaging markers, which would vastly improve the clinical utility of these measures. However, a major challenge is our current poor ability to integrate measures across different large-scale datasets, due to inconsistencies in imaging and non-imaging measures across the different protocols and populations. Here we explore the harmonisation of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) measures across two major studies of healthy elderly populations, the Whitehall II imaging sub-study and the UK Biobank. We identify pre-processing strategies that maximise the consistency across datasets and utilise multivariate regression to characterise sample differences contributing to study-level differences in WMH variations. We also present a parser to harmonise WMH-relevant non-imaging variables across the two datasets. We show that we can provide highly calibrated WMH measures from these datasets with: (1) the inclusion of a number of specific standardised processing steps; and (2) appropriate modelling of sample differences through the alignment of demographic, cognitive and physiological variables. These results open up a wide range of applications for the study of WMHs and other neuroimaging markers across extensive databases of clinical data. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIWe harmonised measures of WMHs across two studies on healthy ageing C_LIO_LISpecific pre-processing strategies can increase comparability across studies C_LIO_LIModelling of biological differences is crucial to provide calibrated measures C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- White Matter Hyperintensity Distribution Differences in Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease Cohorts
Mahsa Dadar, Sawsan Mahmoud, … For the CCNA Group·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Performance of three freely available methods for extracting white matter hyperintensities: FreeSurfer, UBO Detector and BIANCA
Isabel Hotz, Pascal Frédéric Deschwanden, … Lutz Jäncke·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2021
- Harmonization of large multi-site imaging datasets: Application to 10,232 MRIs for the analysis of imaging patterns of structural brain change throughout the lifespan
Raymond Pomponio, Güray Erus, … Christos A. Davatzikos·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2019
- Age differences in brain white matter microstructure in UK Biobank (N = 3,513)
Simon R Cox, Stuart J Ritchie, … Ian J Deary·bioRxiv·May 4, 2016
- White Matter Hyperintensities, Grey Matter Atrophy, and Cognitive Decline in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Mahsa Dadar, Ana Laura Manera, D. Louis Collins·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2021
- Spatial Gradient of Microstructural Changes in Normal-Appearing White Matter in Tracts Affected by White Matter Hyperintensities in Older Age
Susana Muñoz Maniega, Rozanna Meijboom, … Joanna Marguerite Wardlaw·Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2019