bioRxivBiochemistry
A framework for quality control in quantitative proteomics
K. A. Tsantilas, G. E. Merrihew, J. E. Robbins, R. S. Johnson, J. Park, D. L. Plubell, J. D. Canterbury, E. Huang, M. Riffle, V. Sharma, B. X. MacLean, J. Eckels, C. C. Wu, M. S. Bereman, S. E. Spencer, A. N. Hoofnagle, M. J. MacCoss
Abstract
A thorough evaluation of the quality, reproducibility, and variability of bottom-up proteomics data is necessary at every stage of a workflow from planning to analysis. We share vignettes applying adaptable quality control (QC) measures to assess sample preparation, system function, and quantitative analysis. System suitability samples are repeatedly measured longitudinally with targeted methods, and we share examples where they are used on three instrument platforms to identify severe system failures and track function over months to years. Internal QCs incorporated at protein and peptide-level allow our team to assess sample preparation issues and to differentiate system failures from sample-specific issues. External QC samples prepared alongside our experimental samples are used to verify the consistency and quantitative potential of our results during batch correction and normalization before assessing biological phenotypes. We combine these controls with rapid analysis (Skyline), longitudinal QC metrics (AutoQC), and server-based data deposition (PanoramaWeb). We propose that this integrated approach to QC is a useful starting point for groups to facilitate rapid quality control assessment to ensure that valuable instrument time is used to collect the best quality data possible. Data are available on Panorama Public and on ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD051318.
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Large-scale quantitative benchmark reveals accuracy limits of proteomics
Łukasz Szyrwiel, Justus L. Großmann, … Vadim Demichev·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2025
- QC-espresso: Brewing quality in proteomics
Guilherme Pauperio Lanfredi, Jackson Gabriel Miyamoto·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2026
- Quartet protein reference materials and datasets for multi-platform assessment of label-free proteomics
Sha Tian, Dongdong Zhan, … Chen Ding·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2023
- pmultiqc: An open-source, lightweight, and metadata-oriented QC reporting library for MS proteomics
Qi-Xuan Yue, Chengxin Dai, … Yasset Pérez‐Riverol·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2026
- A simple approach for accurate peptide quantification in MS-based proteomics
T. M. Mendes Maia, A. Staes, … F. Impens·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2019
- Recommendations for Quantitative Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) Proteomics using Controlled Quantitative Experiments (CQEs)
Andrew Michael Frey, Frances R. Sidgwick, … Matthias Trost·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2025