Familial CancerGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Novel MAPK/AKT-impairing germline NRAS variant identified in a melanoma-prone family
Kevin M. BrowniD, Mai XuiD, Michael R. SargeniD, Hyunbum JangiD, Mingzhen ZhangiD, Tongwu ZhangiD, Bin ZhuiD, Kristie Jones, Jung KimiD, Laura MendozaiD, Nicholas K. HaywardiD, Margaret Anne TuckeriD, Alisa M. GoldsteiniD, Xiaohong Rose YangiD, Douglas R. StewartiD, Belynda D. HicksiD, Dario ConsonniiD, Angela Cecilia PesatoriiD, Maria Concetta FargnoliiD, Ketty PerisiD, Alex Stratigos, Chiara MeniniD, Paola GhiorzoiD, Susana PuigiD, Eduardo NagoreiD, , Maria Teresa LandiiD
Abstract
While several high-penetrance melanoma risk genes are known, variation in these genes fail to explain melanoma susceptibility in a large proportion of high-risk families. As part of a melanoma family sequencing study, including 435 families from Mediterranean populations, we identified a novel NRAS variant (c.170A>C, p.D57A) in a melanoma-prone family. This variant is absent in exomes in gnomAD, ESP, UKBiobank, and the 1000 Genomes Project, as well as in 11 273 Mediterranean individuals and 109 melanoma-prone families from the US and Australia. This variant occurs in the GTP-binding pocket of NRAS. Differently from other RAS activating alterations, NRAS D57A expression is unable to activate MAPK-pathway both constitutively and after stimulation but enhances EGF-induced PI3K-pathway signaling in serum starved conditions in vitro. Consistent with in vitro data demonstrating that NRAS D57A does not enrich GTP binding, molecular modeling suggests that the D57A substitution would be expected to impair Mg2+ binding and decrease nucleotide-binding and GTPase activity of NRAS. While we cannot firmly establish NRAS c.170A>C (p.D57A) as a melanoma susceptibility variant, further investigation of NRAS as a familial melanoma gene is warranted.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.08
- Field percentile
- 31th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Functional differences drive the selection of NRAS mutants in melanoma
B. M. Murphy, T. J. Weiss, … C. E. Burd·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2021
- Functional characterization of the 9q34.13 locus identifies RAPGEF1 as modulating risk for melanoma and nevi via RAS activation
Rohit Thakur, Mai Xu, … Kevin M. Brown·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2026
- A mutation-resolved therapeutic atlas of NRAS-mutant melanoma reveals genotype-selective response to RAS(ON) inhibition and adaptive STAT3 survival
Sai Fung Yeung, July Xi Chen, … Stephen Kwok‐Wing Tsui·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2026
- Genetic Drivers of Sensitivity or Resistance to RAS(ON) Multi-Selective Inhibitors in NRAS-Mutated Melanoma
Mona Foth, Wontak Kim, … Martin McMahon·Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 22, 2026
- Large distant deletion disrupts CDKN2A enhancer and predisposes to melanoma
Peter A. Johansson, Kelly M. Brooks, … Antonia L. Pritchard·medRxiv·May 18, 2026
- New insights into the classification of the RAC1 P29S hotspot mutation in melanoma as an oncogene
Amin Mirzaiebadizi, Mohammad Reza Ahmadian·Cancer Gene TherapyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2025