Actively cycling cells in uninjured connective tissue are not a prerequisite for appendage regeneration
Abstract
Multiple hypotheses have been formulated to explain differences in tissue repair ability across vertebrates. One hypothesis posits that the accessibility of actively cycling stromal cells within uninjured tissue confers access to a proliferative population in response to tissue damage. This hypothesis further suggests that animals with an indeterminate growth mode possess an actively cycling cell population necessary for growth that can be readily accessed for tissue regeneration. Moreover, the absence of an actively cycling population in connective tissue provides a mechanism that restricts regeneration in animals with determinate growth whose cells are refractory to cell cycle progression and proliferation to produce new tissue for morphogenesis. Here, we explore this paradigm using an EdU-BrdU pulse chase strategy in four different vertebrate species: two with determinate (Acomys dimidiatus and Mus musculus) and two with indeterminate modes of growth (Danio rerio and Ambystoma mexicanum). We find that although indeterminate growers do possess a small population of actively cycling cells, this population does not contribute to regeneration. Moreover, we found that while Acomys does not possess a population of actively cycling stromal cells, cells re-enter the cell cycle de novo in these animals to contribute to regeneration. Furthermore, testing this hypothesis allowed us to ask whether tissue injury could stimulate cell cycle re-entry - a so-called primed state - in cells at distance from the injury site in these four species and we did not find evidence of such priming in stromal or epidermal tissue. HighlightsO_LICell cycle re-entry is a common response to injury in regenerative and non-regenerative vertebrates that is independent of actively cycling stromal cells in uninjured connective tissue C_LIO_LIActively cycling cells do not contribute to regenerative healing in spiny mice, axolotls or zebrafish. C_LIO_LIOur data do not support systemic cell cycle activation in response to injury. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Specific cell states underlie complex tissue regeneration in spiny mice
Emilio Oviedo Rivadeneira, Robyn S. Allen, … Ashley Winn Seifert·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2025
- Positional information modulates transient regeneration-activated cell states during vertebrate appendage regeneration.
Augusto Ortega Granillo, Daniel Zamora, … Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2024
- Regeneration in the absence of a blastema requires cell division but is not tied to wound healing in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi
Julia Ramon-Mateu, Tori Ellison, … Mark Q. Martindale·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2019
- Mechanical control of tissue growth during limb regeneration
Sandra Edwards‐Jorquera, Alberto S. Ceccarelli, … Tatiana Sandoval‐Guzmán·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2025
- Lack of specificity of planarian progenitor responses to injury in regeneration
Cecilia E Pellegrini, Peter W. Reddien·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- Adaptive immunity is dispensable for appendage regeneration in highly regenerative vertebrates
Lizbeth Airais Bolaños Castro, Yaswanth Othayoth Valappil, … Maximina Hee Yun·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2026