Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
L. M. Leon, A. E. Park, A. L. Borges, J. Zhang, J. Bondy-Denomy
Abstract
Bacteria deploy multiple defense mechanisms to prevent the invasion of mobile genetic elements (MGEs). CRISPR-Cas systems use RNA-guided nucleases to target MGEs, which in turn produce anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins that inactivate Cas protein effectors. The minimal component Type I-C CRISPR-Cas subtype is highly prevalent in bacteria, and yet a lack of a tractable in vivo model system has slowed its study, the identification of cognate Acr proteins, and thus our understanding of its true role in nature. Here, we describe MGE-MGE conflict between a mobile Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type I-C CRISPR-Cas system always encoded on pKLC102-like conjugative elements, which are large mobile islands, and seven new Type I-C anti-CRISPRs (AcrIF2*, AcrIC3-IC8) encoded by phages, other mobile islands, and transposons. The P. aeruginosa Type I-C system possesses a total of 300 non-redundant spacers (from 980 spacers total) across the 42 genomes analyzed, predominantly targeting P. aeruginosa phages. Of the seven new Type I-C anti-CRISPRs, all but one are highly acidic, and four have surprisingly broad inhibition activity, blocking multiple distantly related P. aeruginosa Type I CRISPR system subtypes (e.g. I-C and I-F, or I-C and I-E), including AcrIF2 (now, AcrIF2*), a previously described DNA mimic. Anti-type I-C activity of AcrIF2* was far more sensitive to mutagenesis of acidic residues in AcrIF2* than anti-type I-F activity, suggesting distinct binding mechanisms for this highly negatively charged protein. Five of the seven Acr proteins block DNA-binding, while the other two act downstream of DNA-binding, likely by preventing Cas3 recruitment or activity. For one such Cas3 inhibitor (AcrIC3), we identify a novel anti-CRISPR evasion strategy: a cas3-cas8 gene fusion, which also occurs in nature. Collectively, the Type I-C CRISPR spacer diversity and corresponding anti-CRISPR response, all occurring on Pseudomonas MGEs, demonstrates an active co-evolutionary battle between parasitic elements.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Discovery of multiple anti-CRISPRs uncovers anti-defense gene clustering in mobile genetic elements
R. Pinilla-Redondo, S. Shehreen, … J. Bondy-Denomy·bioRxiv·May 22, 2020
- Potent Cas9 inhibition in bacterial and human cells by new anti-CRISPR protein families
Jooyoung Lee, Aamir Mir, … Erik J. Sontheimer·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2018
- Acquisition of novel arrays via horizontal gene transfer rewire CRISPR-mediated defense in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Robbie Paul Paran Malaluan, Ron Leonard V. Dy·Journal of BacteriologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 6, 2026
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa CRISPR-Cas primes a minimal proline-codon toxin to abort anti-CRISPR phages
- The paradoxical relationship between CRISPR-Cas and phage susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
C. Lood, E. Verkinderen, … R. Lavigne·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2022
- CRISPR-Cas systems restrict horizontal gene transfer in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Rachel M. Wheatley, R. Craig MacLean·The ISME JournalPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2020