Genome biologyGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Genome-wide analyses of chromatin interactions after the loss of Pol I, Pol II and Pol III
Yongpeng JiangiD, Jie Sheng HuangiD, Kehuan Lun, Boyuan LiiD, Haonan ZhengiD, Yuanjun Li, Rong ZhouiD, Wenjia Duan, Chenlu WangiD, Yuanqing FengiD, Hong YaoiD, Cheng LiiD, Xiong JiiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe relationship between transcription and the 3D genome organization is one of the most important questions in molecular biology, but the roles of transcription in 3D chromatin remain controversial. Multiple groups showed that transcription affects global Cohesin binding and genome 3D structures. At the same time, several studies have indicated that transcription inhibition does not affect global chromatin interactions. ResultsHere, we provide the most comprehensive evidence to date to demonstrate that transcription plays a marginal role in organizing the 3D genome in mammalian cells: 1) degraded Pol I, Pol II and Pol III proteins in mESCs, and showed their loss results in little or no changes of global 3D chromatin structures for the first time; 2) selected RNA polymerases high abundance binding sites-associated interactions and found they still persist after the degradation; 3) generated higher resolution chromatin interaction maps and revealed that transcription inhibition mildly alters small loop domains; 4) identified Pol II bound but CTCF and Cohesin unbound loops and disclosed that they are largely resistant to transcription inhibition. Interestingly, Pol II depletion for a longer time significantly affects the chromatin accessibility and Cohesin occupancy, suggesting RNA polymerases are capable of affecting the 3D genome indirectly. So, the direct and indirect effects of transcription inhibition explain the previous confusing effects on the 3D genome. ConclusionsWe conclude that Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III loss only mildly alter chromatin interactions in mammalian cells, suggesting the 3D chromatin structures are pre-established and relatively stable.
- organism: mouse
- assay: ChIP-seq
- assay: Hi-C
- research focus: genome assembly
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 139
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enhancer-promoter interactions and transcription are maintained upon acute loss of CTCF, cohesin, WAPL, and YY1
Tsung-Han S. Hsieh, Claudia Cattoglio, … Robert Tjian·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2021
- Cohesin-dependent and independent mechanisms support chromosomal contacts between promoters and enhancers
Michiel J. Thiecke, Gordana Wutz, … Mikhail Spivakov·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2020
- Enhancer-promoter contact formation requires RNAPII and antagonizes loop extrusion
Shu Zhang, Nadine Übelmesser, … Argyris Papantonis·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2023
- Context-dependent 3D genome regulation by cohesin and related factors
Ryuichiro Nakato, Toyonori Sakata, … Katsuhiko Shirahige·bioRxiv·May 24, 2022
- Transcription regulates the spatio-temporal dynamics of genes through micro-compartmentalization
- Transcription shapes 3D chromatin organization by interacting with loop extrusion
Edward J. Banigan, Wen Tang, … Leonid A. Mirny·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2023