bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
P176S polymorphism in Maspin rewires electrostatic interaction that alters Maspin functionality
Abstract
Maspin has been known to regress tumors by inhibiting angiogenesis, however, its roles have been reported to be context and sequence-dependent. There are various proteins and cofactors that bind with maspin possibly explaining the conflicting roles of maspin. Moreover, maspin polymorphic forms have also been linked to tumor regression or survival, for instance, maspin with Ser at 176 (maspin-S176) promotes tumor while maspin with Pro at 176 (maspin-Pro176) has opposing roles in cancer pathogenesis. With the help of long molecular dynamic simulation, a possible link between polymorphic forms and tumor progression has been established. First, the maspin is dynamically stable with either amino acid at 176 position, secondly, differential contacts have been observed among various regions, thirdly, these contacts have significantly altered the electrostatic energetics of various residues, and finally, these altered electrostatics of maspin-S176 and maspin-P176 rewired the polar contacts that abolished the allosteric control in protein. By combining these factors, the altered electrostatics can substantially affect the localization, and the preference of maspin binding partners, thus, culminating in a different maspin-protein (cofactor)-interaction landscape that could have been manifested with conflicting reports in previous studies. Here, the underlying reason has been highlighted and discussed that could be helpful for better therapeutic manipulations. SignificanceProtein altered functions in response to mutations are well documented, however, a slight perturbation in structure can lead to dramatic effects that are being felt at longer distances are rare. Here, we have reported that the substitution of Pro to Ser at 176th position in Maspin can substantially alter the protein electrostatic interactions that can hamper the allosteric control. This could lead to different binding partners, localization preferences, and altered cytoplasmic retention duration resulting in functions that are not associated with normal protein. Moreover, the electrostatic attraction/repulsion can immensely affect the allosteric cohesion of protein resulting in unexpected outcomes.
- organism: human
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Maspin/SerpinB5 is a cytoskeleton-binding protein that regulates epithelial cell shape
Luiz Eduardo da Silva, Lia Mara Gomes Paim, … Nathalie Cella·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2025
- Disentangling the mutational effects on protein stability and interaction of human MLH1
Sven Larsen-Ledet, Aleksandra Panfilova, Amelie Stein·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2025
- Molecular mechanisms of dynamics-mediated effects of pathogenic missense mutations on Menin protein function
Qian Zhang, Yinghao Guo, … Bin Sun·The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2026
- Proteins That Interact with the Mucin-Type Glycoprotein Msb2p Include Regulators of the Actin Cytoskeleton
A. Prabhakar, N. Vadaie, … P. J. Cullen·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2019
- Stability of ligand-induced protein conformation influences affinity in maltose-binding protein
M. van der Noort, M. de Boer, B. Poolman·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2021
- Clinically observed RASA1 missense mutants exhibit diverse RasGAP protein behaviors
Maxum E. Paul, Rediet B. Delelegne, … Titus J. Boggon·Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026