MerQuaCo: a computational tool for quality control in image-based spatial transcriptomics
Naomi X. MartiniD, Paul A. OlseniD, Jacob Quon, Jazmin CamposiD, Nasmil Valera CuevasiD, Josh NagraiD, Marshall VanNessiD, Zoe MaltzeriD, Emily C. GelfandiD, Alana A. OyamaiD, Amanda GaryiD, Yimin WangiD, Angela Alaya, Augustin RuiziD, Cade ReynoldsoniD, Cameron BielsteiniD, Christina Alice PomiD, Cindy Tzu-Ling HuangiD, Cliff SlaughterbeckiD, Elizabeth LiangiD, Jason Alexander, Jeanelle ArizaiD, Jocelin MaloneiD, Jose Melchor, Kaity Colbert, , Jack WatersiD
Abstract
Image-based spatial transcriptomics platforms are powerful tools often used to identify cell populations and describe gene expression in intact tissue. Spatial experiments return large, high-dimensional datasets and several open-source software packages are available to facilitate analysis and visualization. The outputs of spatial transcriptomics platforms are typically imperfect. For example, local variations in transcript detection probability are common. Software tools to characterize imperfections and their impact on downstream analyses are lacking so the data quality is assessed manually, a laborious and often a subjective process. Here we describe imperfections in a dataset of 641 fresh-frozen adult mouse brain sections collected using the Vizgen MERSCOPE. Common imperfections included the local loss of tissue from the section, tissue outside the imaging volume due to detachment from the coverslip, transcripts missing due to dropped images, varying detection probability through space, and differences in transcript detection probability between experiments. We describe the incidence of each imperfection and the likely impact on the accuracy of cell type labels. We develop MerQuaCo, open-source code that detects and quantifies imperfections without user input, facilitating the selection of sections for further analysis with existing packages. Together, our results and MerQuaCo facilitate rigorous, objective assessment of the quality of spatial transcriptomics results.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- SpaceTrooper: a quality control framework for imaging-basedspatial omics data
Benedetta Banzi, Dario Righelli, … Silvio Bicciato·bioRxiv·Dec 26, 2025
- Reconstructing biologically coherent cellular profiles from imaging-based spatial transcriptomics
Long Yuan, Youyun Zheng, … Atul Deshpande·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2026
- CRISP enables comparisons of image-based spatial transcriptomicsegmentation quality across ten organs
James R Rose, Elex S. Harris, … Philip J. Santangelo·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2026
- SpatialArtifacts: a computational framework for tissue artifact detection in spatial transcriptomics data
Jiali Harriet He, Jacqueline R. Thompson, … Stephanie C. Hicks·bioRxiv·May 18, 2026
- Impact of Segmentation Errors in Analysis of Spatial Transcriptomics Data.
Jonathan Mitchel, Teng Gao, … Kharchenko Pv·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2026
- SpaceBlocks: an expert-supervised workflow for cohort-level spatial transcriptomics analysis
Sergio Oterino-Sogo, Nazim Mechkouri, … Macha Nikolski·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2026